My interests: Journalism, Politics, International Relations, Urbanism
1 - The New Yorker is the best magazine in the English-speaking world. They employ incredibly good writers.
2 - Without The Guardian, British democracy is utterly fucked. The Brits just don’t know it. Most UK papers are owned by shady characters such as Jonathan Harmsworth. The Brits even have a paper (The Independent) owned by a politically-connected Russian mobster (Evgueni Lebedev).
The Guardian’s non-profit structure gives it more freedom that most UK papers. They often investigate stories the rest of the UK press just won’t touch: Paradise Papers, Panama Papers, Cameron’s tax evasion, etc…
3 - The two best newspapers in France are Le Monde and Mediapart, hands down. Mediapart is a non-profit. Le Monde journalists have special rights and can’t be removed by shareholders. These 2 newspapers are more independent than the rest of the french press.
4 - The Financial Times is the favorite newspaper of elites worldwide. CEOs. Billionaires. Millionaires. Presidents. Prime Ministers. Everyone reads it. And honestly, it’s very solid. The information is always extremely reliable. The FT is also the most expensive newspaper on the planet. But they sometimes publish free stories.
5 - The editorial section of the Wall Street Journal is directly controlled by Billionaire Rupert Murdoch. The WSJ is the jewel of his global media empire. Fox News and the New York Post are for influencing the masses. WSJ editorials actually allow him to have influence over US high income readers.
6 - If you read WSJ editorials, Rupert Murdoch’s ideas are very simple. Labor unions must be crushed. Corporate concentration is good. Netanyahu is a brave man. US military spending is good. Unions should be restricted by tough laws. Environmental rules are bad. Slash taxes on large corporations. Of course, he doesn’t write it openly. But this what virtually most of the WSJ editorial content boils down to.
7 - Many talented reporters work for the Wall Street Journal and end up deeply ashamed of it. It feels like prostitution. Many would much rather work for The Financial Times, New York Times or ProPublica.
Rupert Murdoch employs great reporters at the Wall Street Journal simply because he needs them to acquire credibility in order to influence readers through his WSJ editorials. If the WSJ was 100% full of trash, american high income readers wouldn’t purchase it.
8 - The best coverage of Silicon Valley is an online newspaper called The Information. If you truly want to know what Meta/Adobe/Microsoft executives are up to, read The Information. Most of their readers are very wealthy investors and rival tech executives.
9 - 90% of leftists who attack the New York Times are wrong.
"The New York Times doesn’t go after powerful people"
They literally took down Harvey Weinstein.
They literally went after Rupert Murdoch
“The New York Times is very pro-israel”
They exposed Israeli war crimes.
The Israeli Prime Minister says he hates them.
“The New York Times didn’t warn americans against Trump”
They did. They really did.
“The New York Times doesn’t cover labor rights”
They exposed how the biggest US Corporations illegally use child labor
They exposed Starbucks vicious war against unions
I’m not saying it’s a perfect news organization. A perfect news organization does not exist. But it’s a very solid one. 90% of leftists who attack it are using bad faith arguments.
10 - When it comes to television and radio, public media (PBS, BBC, NPR, CBC) is often more professional, more serious, than corporate media. PBS or CBC make outstanding documentaries. Stuff US/Canadian private networks just wouldn’t make.
11 - Generally speaking, journalism that you pay for is far better than journalism you don’t pay for. This is a general rule, not a law of physics. There are exceptions. The Daily Mail has subscribers. It’s largely non-sense. ProPublica is free. They do stunning investigations.
12 - AIPAC is a powerful lobbying organization. But there is limit to their power. There was an intense AIPAC campaign to stop the President Obama from signing a nuclear agreement with Iran. And he defeated them .
13 - Most Trump tweets aren’t written by Donald Trump. They are written by a dude named Dan Scavino. Most americans have no clue who Dan Scavino is. They wouldn’t know him if they met him in the supermarket.
14 - Having a lot of resources is a curse. Countries that have natural ressources (Iran, Algeria, Nigeria, Russia) tend to be highly corrupt and exploited by a small elite. It’s simple. The elite can take control of the oil fields, the gas fields, the mines. Just sell ressources. Shoot protesters. No need to invest in anything else. It’s much better to live a country with limited resources (Taiwan, Japan, Switzerland). Lack of resources force the elites to invest in science and education. The most unlucky country in Africa is Congo. It’s full of diamonds, forests, oil, gas, lithium, cobalt, rare earth. So Congo has suffered horribly because of that. In fact, it’s still being looted.
15 - If you want to transform an authoritarian regime into a democracy from within, the number 1 tool you need are powerful labor unions. Powerful unions can basically go on a general solidarity strike and shut down an entire economy.
16 - Everything Barack Obama predicted would happen if the US didn’t sign the nuclear agreement with Iran actually happened. Trump left the agreement. Iran started enriching nuclear fuel. Then a major war happened.
17 - Many Middle Easterners are very tribal. Most Israelis see themselves as Jewish first, Israeli second. Syrian druzes think of themselves as Druze first, Syrian second. Many lebanese Shias see themselves as Shia first, Lebanese a distant second. And so on. Their loyalty often lies more to their tribe than to the State they actually live in.
18 - Imperialism was bad. But imperialism didn’t actually cause instability in the Middle East. The most stable period was actually Ottoman Imperialism. For 5 centuries there was commerce and peace. Then, there was the British/French empire. Apart from some episodes of violence, it was stable. But when imperialism ended, it was basically a mess. Jews vs Arabs. Christians vs Sunnis. Arabs vs Persians. Jews vs Shias. Arabs vs Kurds. Alawis vs Sunnis. To this day, many of them have this tribal mindset.
19 - Saying “we don’t speak with terrorists” is completely dumb. Many terrorist organizations later became peaceful. Many terrorist leaders later became statesmen. It’s wrong to say “We can’t make any peace with those who hands are stained with blood”. Get out of here with that non-sense. If you truly want peace, seeking only decent leaders means you aren’t going to find anyone at all. Criminals make peace. This isn’t Scandinavia.
20 - The most ugly, polluted and noisy cities in the world have one thing in common. They have cars everywhere. The best cities in the world (Singapore, Geneva, Copenhaguen) all have one thing in common. They try to aggressively reduce car ownership. If you want to improve the cities, you need to increase parking costs. Pedestrianize streets. Build bike lanes. The hard part is the politics. Car owners see the short term pain. They never see the long term gains.
What are things you know because of your personal interests that most people have no idea about ?
You can clean dirty/corroded electronic edge contacts with a pencil eraser. Also helps equally as cleaning preparation before soldering.
Go ahead and try it yourself on an old penny, it’ll clean up and look shiny as new. Same principle for electronics.
A good rubber eraser also takes sticker adhesive right off of most surfaces, safely.
Wait wait wait, for real? I’m 42, how did I not know this?
The real LPT is always in the comments.
Ha, yeah. Snap-On sells a 400$ tool that takes 30$ consumable rubber wheels. Or you could use a 99 cent pink pencil eraser.
Snap-On’s Snap-On: they are a BRAND-Identity, not an engineering-actual-solutions-to-acutal-problems company.
There’s a Project Farm, or something, yt-channel, where they guy just does comparative-tests of different products, to see what the truth is, & … it’s a resource all ought be knowing-about.
Ha I DID remember its name right! https://www.youtube.com/@ProjectFarm/videos
_ /\ _
So does fresh duct tape.
My dad taught me this!
Awesome!
Yeah, there’s one drawback though, if the edge contacts or whatever trace was originally gold plated, the pencil eraser trick will pretty quickly wear away the gold plating.
But… If you got corroded gold plated contacts, the gold plating itself is the least of your worries, you want clean metal…
Gold doesn’t corrode, Hoomin…
If it’s corroded where the gold wasn’t … that’s different.
_ /\ _
I’m well aware of that actually. But if the gold plating is already worn and/or pitted, then the copper underneath will corrode through and even on top of the gold.
Plus, if it counts for anything, I happen to have an open faced USB-A flash drive on my pocket keychain, that actually does still have its gold contact plating, but just looking at it right now, I’ll have to clean the contacts once again from pocket crud before I use it again.
In that case though, I usually just lick my thumb, wipe the contacts clean, and dry it off with my shirt. Gold itself might not inherently corrode, but it can and will still get dirty, plus that plating is super thin and just regular use will eventually wear it away down to the bare copper underneath.
Please stick a cap on it, if you want it to last.
Tech that works is worth protecting.
_ /\ _
Nah, it’s an early model Lacie USB key shell from 2011. The way they designed it, it was actually never meant to go on an actual keychain nor in my pocket, it was meant to go on a lanyard. Also, the way they designed it, a cap could never stay on there, even if I tried.
I had to very carefully arrange my keys to lay perfectly parallel to and not rub against the USB traces or bend or otherwise damage the key. But yeah for real, it would never hold a cap, especially in my pocket, even if I tried.
It’s almost held up pretty well since 2011 though, and has even been dismantled and rebuilt twice for flash storage upgrades. Currently I keep Linux Mint MATE 22.1 installer/live boot on it, nothing else right now so no personal data, so honestly it’s no big deal for me.
For reference, here’s a new one on eBay, with way more than the 8GB module I currently have in mine…
I learned this when I was a kid, and the only problem is that nowadays, I haven’t seen a pencil nor its eraser and probably 15 years.
Still, a pretty great tip!
Normal people use alcohol or flux
I do a ton of electronics repair, would never in a million years think that an eraser is going to do anything but make my life harder
OK… But have you tried it?
Why would I do that? So I can fuck up my precision solders on expensive boards??? I need my electrical connections to be free of dirt and debris, and the way to accomplish that is by cleaning it with a solvent or flux. Using an eraser is the equivalent of rubbing it with your fingers… you’re not going to remove the small particulate or oils. Haven’t tried it; won’t. Its piss-poor advice.
Edit downvoters don’t seem to be aware that the last thing you need on a solder site is eraser particulate. Do yourself a favor, go rub a pencil eraser on two things and then try to solder them together without cleaning with flux or alcohol. Send pics lol
We who’ve done it blow the particles away to get them out of the area.
It’s a practice used when cleaning ( by sanding, grinding, etc ) throughout industry.
The removing-film & surface-dirt with an eraser is valid, but not cleanroom, obviously.
_ /\ _
Having a lot of resources is a curse. Countries that have natural ressources (Iran, Algeria, Nigeria, Russia) tend to be highly corrupt and exploited by a small elite. It’s simple. The elite can take control of the oil fields, the gas fields, the mines. Just sell ressources. Shoot protesters. No need to invest in anything else. It’s much better to live a country with limited resources (Taiwan, Japan, Switzerland). Lack of resources force the elites to invest in science and education. The most unlucky country in Africa is Congo. It’s full of diamonds, forests, oil, gas, lithium, cobalt, rare earth. So Congo has suffered horribly because of that. In fact, it’s still being looted.
This isn’t actually true. You can look at the Nordic countries which are very oil rich and owe a lot of their prosperity to that. The United States is pretty resource rich as well. What is a curse is imperialism, and having lots of resources attracts lots of imperialists. The “oil curse” or “resource curse” is a myth made up to whitewash imperialists and absolve them of guilt.
Strap in and let me tell you about my special interest, Iranian history. In the 1800s, before the discovery of oil, Iran was ruled by an extremely corrupt line of shahs who sold out every part of the impoverished country to fund their lavish lifestyles and massive harems - to the point that other countries had to step in and say that they weren’t allowed to sell out that much of the country. But the Iranian people were upset by this state of affairs, and staged a massive boycott, which set the stage for a mass movement in 1905 that established a democratic parliament and a constitution, with the support of an overwhelming majority, including the clergy (a fatwa was actually issued declaring violating the boycott to be haram). Iran was well on it’s way to becoming a peaceful, prosperous, democratic society - but then the Fire Nation attacked, in the form of the British and Russian Empires moving in, shelling the parliament building and dividing the nation between themselves, like a pack of wolves.
The Iranian people suffered tremendously in the following years, with major plagues, famines, and genocide conducted by the Ottoman Empire. Of course, the Russian Empire collapsed, the British took the opportunity to unify the country, propping up a shah of a new dynasty as their puppet. That shah proved uncooperative during WWII, and the Allies invaded to set up supply lines between the Eastern and Western fronts and to secure the Iranian oil (which had now been discovered), and the shah was forced to abdicate to his son, who the British found more amenable.
The British technically owned the rights to Iran’s oil, but the deal they had made was with the previous dynasty (Qajar). The one that had been selling out their country to an absurd degree, the one that had been overthrown by the people precisely because they were selling out the country, and so naturally the deal they had struck with the British regarding oil (which had been made before oil had even been discovered in Iran) gave them extremely lucrative terms. But it actually didn’t matter how lucrative the terms were because the British were just straight up stealing it. They falsified their records and forbid any kind of inspection of their facilities.
This led the Iranian people to once again mobilize in support of democracy and self-rule. As outrage over the exploitation grew, the shah, who had previously rubber-stamped anyone the British picked, began to fear his own people more than the British and appointed democratic reformer Mohammad Mossadegh as prime minister. After the Iranians had watched the British stonewall them for decades, Mossadegh nationalized the oil industry with overwhelming public support. Iran was once again on track to becoming a peaceful, democratic, independent country.
But the British set up a naval blockade that crippled their economy. Iranians, at this point, had a neutral to positive view of the US, and hoped that it would live up to its stated ideals and support them against the British. The British, meanwhile, expected the Americans to back up their “property rights.” President Truman threw up his hands in frustration, seeing both sides as intransigent. But Churchill simply waited him out, and offered his successor Eisenhower British support in Korea and NATO in exchange for the CIA launching a coup, and so Iran was passed around like a bargaining chip. Mossadegh’s commitment to democratic ideals allowed the CIA free reign, he didn’t crack down on the press despite the CIA controlling virtually all the newspapers, he didn’t crack down on protests while the CIA was hiring protesters on both sides, etc. Naturally, he was ousted (although the CIA denied it/covered it up for decades), and the shah was given much more power (which he used to hunt down and exterminate the Iranian left) and the oil kept flowing.
But after a few decades, once again, outrage over the exploitation came to a head, and the shah, seeking to appease his people, participated in a multinational oil boycott. But as a result, his foreign support was withdrawn, which set the stage for the Islamic Revolution. President Carter, against the advice of his state department, allowed the shah to take refuge in the US. Naturally, this outraged the Iranians, because the US had previously staged a coup to install the very same man as a dictator. In retaliation, some of the revolutionaries seized the US embassy and took hostages. This of course led to a breakdown in relations between the US and Iran.
And so, Iran is often held up as an example of this supposed “resource curse” that leads to political instability (not to mention the old line about “Islam is incompatible with democracy”), but the reality is that the country had multiple times in its history where it could’ve become stable, peaceful, democratic, and independent, but those chances were destroyed, not by Iranians, but by foreign imperialists, the vile colonial empires of the British and Americans. Had they simply been left alone, they would not have suffered from this supposed “resource curse.” If you look into the history of any similar country, you will find a similar story. But the history of these countries are simply not taught and not known in the imperial core, and so other explanations are invented.
There’s a documentary about the British and American involvement in the Iranian coup called ‘Coup 53’
There’s a really good book called “All the Shahs men” too which I really enjoyed
Thanks, I didn’t know about it and I’ll definitely check it out.
I didn’t source very well but a lot of my info comes from “All the Shah’s Men” by Stephen Kinzer, which I highly recommend.
Well said. I stopped reading after point 13 for this very reason!
Ah yes oil rich Finland
No, oil rich Norway.
Well yeah that’s why talking about “oil rich Nordic countries” is stupid, only one of them is oil rich. That was the point
This isn’t actually true. You can look at the Nordic countries which are very oil rich and owe a lot of their prosperity to that.
I wasn’t actually aware it was just Norway, so I appreciate the correction.
I know more than I ever planned on knowing about audio equipment.
The first thing you need to know is that you cannot defeat physics with marketing hype. I don’t give a flying fuck how many wave guides Bose talks about or all the technology under the sun, you need a big speaker to make deep bass. There is nothing anyone can say or do to change this.
And when you look up audio equipment, ignore the “music power” because they will state what is the momentary maximum power the speaker can handle… but we don’t play micro seconds of MAX power music, we play steady audio… what you need to know is the RMS power the device can handle or output.
Furthermore, audio cables are a complete sham. You can take any power cable from a discarded vacuum, boom, you’ve got speaker cable. But but gold connectors… Yeah no.
When I was a cable guy a customer’s Monster Cable RG-6 fell off in my hand.
“Ah! My Monster Cable!”
“I’ll make you a better one.”
I knew they weren’t up to the hype, but fuck me, the shielding was single-wrap, made of Chinese whispers and toilet paper. The copper core could be bent with harsh words. The dialectric (white part) was some form of marshmallow. In my 3 years in the industry, Monster was the shittiest cable I ever encountered, a cut below the cheapest Walmart cable.
Made him a new one, cut to size, out of our standard quad-shielded, real coax. Quite a lesson for both of us.
Nice one! I’ll have to borrow that idea, and next time I scrap some coax I’ll coil up some for later. Good tip.
Yeah Monster is so bad they’re a dollar store item where I live. Not even kidding!
Cable hype is in every industry. You can buy hundred-dollar gold plated “Gaming” HDMI cables that are no better than any other HDMI cord
the one that kills me is some genius is selling TOSLINK cables with gold plated connectors.
TOSLINK is a fiber optic standard. The whole point of it is that the cable is non-conductive.
John Carver torpedoed the “golden ear” self-deluded class, one time, purrfectly…
He had them appear to review/compare a pair of prototype amplifiers…
They did, eventually coming to the consensus that 1 was categorically better than the other.
Then John Carver removed the covers, & the ONLY difference between the amps, was the packaging they were in: the circuit-boards were identical.
He had ZERO respect for all the snake-oil bullshit stuff going on.
I’ve dug-into speaker-builder books enough to know that yes, waveguides do make difference in acoustics, & yes, you can hear that difference ( compared with plain-box speakers that are closed, all 'round ).
I have not paid-for any of the speaker-builder software ( & Linux has some FLOSS stuff, in that domain, anyways, now ),
but yes, it is actual-fact, that to make lower-frequencies of sound, you need bigger speaker-drivers.
For high-fidelity concert, I’d want 15" drivers, or pairs-of-12"-ones, on the sound-reinforcement speakers, if it were needing good quality bass. ( for a Liquid-Jungle genre concert, or something )
( I can’t hear low-enough to hear the lowest human-hearable frequencies, but others can: it’d matter for them, right? )
_ /\ _
Be careful with that makeshift speaker cabling though. If you’re using small gauge power cables, you could easily melt those cables with a powerful enough audio signal.
You’d be hard-pressed to find an amplifier that could output so much power it would melt a vacuum power cable or lamp cord lol
Light-duty power cables can handle like 1,400-1,800W you’re never going to find anything that can output even close to that… unless you are the audio/hardware guy for outdoor concerts.
Of course, don’t use angel-hair wires
Would you use this as speaker wire?
https://www.amazon.com/Conductor-Electrical-Oxygen-free-Automotive-2AWG-32-8FT/dp/B093LCQQFY/
I wouldn’t.
I’m just saying be careful. Power cables aren’t all equal. Anyone doing this should understand what kind of wire they need, and make sure they’re not using one that’s too thin.
Stuff like this:
https://www.amazon.com/Cordless-Charger-XBCHGX140-Replacement-Charging/dp/B0BFDFXYR4/
Is unsafe, even though it’s for a (rechargeable) vacuum.
Use ANY shielded-cable which can handle the current, & has the right kind of connectors on the ends.
Period.
That’s the ONLY 3 criteria I care about, now.
That’s why I recommend Cat6A cable for the foil-shielding in it, to block alien-crosstalk, in ethernet setups: you don’t get speed-degradation-due-to-alien-crosstalk.
All the screaming that computer-speakers did, when a GSM phone was near them, that was due to lack-of-shielding.
Find any trustworthy site which lists AWG vs Amperage, & you’ll see what current you can put on that gauge of wire.
Match your current-carrying-capability, & don’t go overboard ( 2AWG for speakers for anything less than a DisasterArea concert, is stupid ).
Signal travels through copper at around 0.7 * speed-of-light ( impedance monkeys it, at higher-frequencies, audio’s functionally DC, for cables )
& the OP wasn’t talking about cordless-rechargeable vacuum-cleaners, but for normal vacuuming-the-whole-floor vacuum-cleaners, which have … 14AWG wire, roughly, in 'em.
_ /\ _
Yes, so, basically what I said. Be careful and understand what you need.
If you’re thinking from the mind of someone who understands current, of course you wouldn’t use 26 awg wire for speakers. When you’re giving advice online though, you have to think from the mind of someone who doesn’t have your same knowledge. OP telling someone “just use a vacuum cleaner power cable” isn’t specific enough, because they don’t have the knowledge OP has to understand what that means.
I completely agree with OP that speaker wire is generally a rip off, and using any suitable wire is fine. I just want OP to also say that you need to know what you’re doing, or you could start a fire.
I’ll give you an anecdote to hopefully illustrate my point. A while ago I was hanging out in a friend’s backyard on a chilly night. She wanted to provide some warmth for the guests, so she brought out two space heaters and a power strip. She plugged them in and turned them on and they ran for about 30 seconds, and the circuit breaker tripped. She went over to it and flipped it back on, and then about 30 seconds later it tripped again.
I’m not saying this to disparage her, but to illustrate that many people don’t understand current, and don’t realize what is and isn’t dangerous when it comes to electricity. It wasn’t unreasonable for her to assume that would work, and it wasn’t unreasonable for her not to understand why it wasn’t. The breaker is there for exactly that reason. When you’re talking about making your own wire, it’s too easy to get it wrong if you don’t know what you’re doing, and that could cause a fire.
Understanding that you need more conductor-cross-section to carry more current’s sooo fundamental to me, that that itself is a problem, obviously…
I’d presumed that telling people to go search for AWG that can carry whatever-current, would be enough…
The 14AWG point, though, should do for apartment-dwellers & normal home-owners.
( seriously, if you’re doing some kind of mega-installation, & you’re putting 20A circuits in, specifically for your amps, then you’d better be able to calculate Ohm’s law, for your speakers, & work-out what currents are required for them )
_ /\ _
deleted by creator
This might not be uncommon around here, but…
Between D&D and video games, I can identify most medieval weapons and armor.
Mythological beasts as well.
Why tf is a Bastard Sword called a Bastard Sword?
Because it’s not strictly one handed or two handed.
Its a combination of two separate families, like an illegitimate child. (Their logic and definitions, not mine)
It’s probably due to the word batard in French meaning something of a dual nature or dubious origin (and can therefore also be used for our more usual use of the word bastard).
As the bastard, or hand a half, sword is halfway in length between the single handed long sword and the two handed great sword and could be used either way. The French specifically call it an epee batard and IIRC correctly there’s a type of French bread called a batard which is like a hybrid of a loaf and a baguette.
People really misunderstand a lot about diving.
1
- SCUBA is an acronym that stands for Self Contained Underwater Breathing Aparatus
- SCUBA specifically refers to the gear with a tank, and not gear that uses an air hose connected to a boat
- Tanks are usually filled with just regular air, nothing special about it
- Oxygen becomes toxic at depth, so if you were to dive with 100% oxygen, you’d die at a fairly shallow depth
2
- Your flesh and blood absorb nitrogen from the air
- The amount it absorbs is based on the pressure of your environment/the air you’re breathing
- When you come back up to one atmosphere (1 bar) of pressure, your body slowly releases the nitrogen it has absorbed at depth
- This is a physical process, not one your body has any control over
- If you stay down for too long or come up too quickly, the nitrogen will become bubbles in your flesh and blood (the bends)
- That’s painful and can kill you
- A hyperbaric chamber (hyper-more than normal, baric-atmospheric pressure) can help by forcing the nitrogen bubbles to dissolve back into your flesh and release slowly
- You can use a special mix of air with more oxygen and less nitrogen than normal to increase safe dive times, but this also decreases maximum depth, because of oxygen toxicity
3
- Another danger is if you ascend without breathing out, your lungs can pop
- Humans don’t have any sense to tell us our lungs are too full
- This is called lung over-expansion and can also kill you
- It is also treated with a stay in a hyperbaric chamber
4
- Another danger is nitrogen at depth can induce an intoxicating effect like alcohol
- This is called nitrogen narcosis and can cause you to act carelessly and get yourself killed
- If you experience this, the correct course of action is to ascend a bit (like 15 feet) and wait until it subsides before you attempt to descend again
- You can use a special mix of air with helium or a special mix of just helium and oxygen to reduce the risk of narcosis on deep dives
5
- Regular diving gear has two second stage regulators, your main and your octo
- The name octo comes from how it makes your gear look like an octopus
- It’s a backup for you and for anyone who might need it
- The hose is yellow to make it easy to see
6
- The vest you wear (not everyone uses one, but most divers do) is called a Buoyancy Control Device, or BCD, or just BC
- It fills with air from your tank when you want to ascend to increase your buoyancy
- In an emergency, you can drop your weights, which should make you positively buoyant and cause you to ascend
And last, but not least:
- Diving is incredibly fun and an experience I’d recommend to everyone who is even remotely interested
You missed a bit. Overcoming your reflexes to “breath” underwater is HELL.
Dated a beautiful diver girl. She lived in the water. Got me in a class with one other person, young guy, to get our first cert.
Don’t know how to put this. Let’s say I’ve been in scarier situations than the vast majority of people reading this comment.
Truck full of skinheads armed with AR-15s rolls up to the punker hangout? Meh. Saving my own life in the face of certain death, twice? I could do it again, I hope.
I’ve been brave. I’ve been a coward. I have never in life been so fucking scared as taking that first breath underwater, took every ounce of courage I had. Only reason I didn’t bail? Didn’t want the young guy to fail. Because he was shitting bricks, couldn’t let him down. We made it!
This definitely varies by person. I never found it bad at all to take that first breath, and even found myself with the opposite problem. Once I was used to SCUBA I had to remind myself not to breathe while swimming without gear.
Also, underwater currents are a lot stronger and faster than you think.
I’m grateful my dumb ass never went to a dive spot that I read about where the currents between 15-60ft deep were intense and there was a chain to follow to guide you down or to hold on to.
No thank you. So scary.
There are dangerous spots to dive, and there are safe spots to dive. Diving can be incredibly safe as long as you know what you’re doing. And it’s incredibly fun. :)
Additional “fun” fact about lung over-expansion. The pressure difference necessary for it to happen is startlingly small if you, for some insane reason, completely fill your lungs. You can do damage rising single digit numbers of feet.
We did a family introduction in a local aquarium and it was amazing. I had a something strange happen to me afterwards. I stopped breathing from time to time. Weird, because rule number one is “keep breathing”.
It started at work where I got the feeling I was suffocating only to realise I was holding my breath unconsciously. I had a constant feeling of being out of breath and only felt good I if I was conscious about breathing. Took me a bit of therapy to get it sorted out. Therapist figured that the dive triggered something in me.
My grandfather was playing with DIY aqua-lungs immediately after the war - listening to his stories when I was knee high I really dont know how the first guys that were doing this didn’t kill them selves more often.
They did. Quite often. :(
But their sacrifices have led to much safer equipment and practices.
Amethyst, citrine and tigers eye are all Quartz they just have various impurities and structural differences that create the differences in color/appearance. Some can even be irritated or heated to change their color.
The Orion nebula can be seen with binoculars depending on the lighting and the famous horse head nebula is actually located very close to it in the sky (visually from our perspective, not physically)
This feels well known but…
Adding split screen to games is actually a very funky process.
It changes how the UI works, input setup, how sounds are handled, how some effects are done, how optimizing is worked on, it significantly increases testing and QA time because split screen may have its own unique bugs, and other quirky problems due to either the game’s or engine’s design (most of the time split screen is not a high priority focus compared to other features)
All that for something a very small percentage of players will even look at.
I often see people lament the lack of split screen games, and I do wish there were more, but its a hard sell and I can see why many games abandon it completely.
(Save for a few that made it entirely their focus, like split fiction)
Yeah, I feel like people are mainly confused/annoyed, because splitscreen multiplayer existed before online multiplayer, so seeing games ship with online multiplayer but no splitscreen, that just feels backwards…
I’d say that for anyone wanting to understand the archetypes, the underlying-Patterns, the “skeleton” underlying games they NEED to hit Architect of Games yt-channel, too.
People not interested in understanding how such things work wouldn’t care about what he’s giving us, but … he cuts right through appearances, to get-into the underlying level…
https://www.youtube.com/@ArchitectofGames/videos
AND understanding what kind of gamers there are, you then need to understand what Nick Yee discovered:
The 2nd video, then the 1st, here:
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Nick+Yee+gamer+motivations+gdc
AND understanding the 14 GENRES is required, too…
https://www.kobo.com/us/en/search?query=John+Truby&fclanguages=en
( anybody who disses that book needs their head examined: there may be 2 fundamental mistakes in it,
1 being the root of humor, which is surprising-violation-of-expectations, and NOT “the drop”, which is a UK & US specific thing ( other put-down cultures, too )…
Hofstadter’s “Godel Escher Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid” explained that humor is simply a strange loop, ie a moebius-strip, where one walks around in a “circle”, but now one’s upside-down for some reason?!?
So, Hofstadter got MUCH deeper than Truby, on that point…
& the other being that the archetype-of-village is the Tribal Mother Village, and not the US’s Wild West village.
Other than those 2 cockups, though, his meanings are profound.
Each of the genres is human-unconscious-mind working at understanding, through imprinting, 1 kind of meaning.
Horror is unconscious-mind trying to get its handle on death.
Action is unconscious-mind trying to get its handle on “morality? morality’s irrelevant: ACTION decides everything.”, ie it’s trying to find its place between inertia & action…
Detective is unconscious-mind trying to convince itself completely-enough that intellect can conquer everything.
etc…
It’s stupendously important understanding, that book…
Anybody wanting to make either a story or story-game, they’d better understand BOTH Truby’s books, & Coyne’s “The Story Grid”, too!
( The Story Grid is THE book on editing. )
Yagoda’s book on Voice is important for people doing writing…
Weissman’s book “Presenting to Win” is absolutely crucial for anybody wanting to understand the fundamental-archetypes of presenting-information, & in stories, it can make-or-break one’s writing, too…
say one has a character who has to fail-to-communicate something, to make the story work right…
Well, if you don’t know th archetypes-of-presenting-information, then you’re likely to botch that, aren’t you?
But if you do know, then just pick from the archetypes which one suits the work, & impliment it!
There’s writing software in Linux called Manuskript or something like that, which is wonderful for helping one write structured stuff, simply because it sets the overall-structure 1st, then you are more filling it in…
not suited to all things, but sometimes it greases-the-wheels sooo good…
a good mind-mapper for always-on-one idea-capture is important, for anybody who is committed to publishing their work, later…
: p
Oh, & this insight was from when I was watching an AoG video, a few years ago?
There’s a game ( I’m not a gamer, at all: don’t feel any point in it ) called, iirc, Rainworld, where there are many creatures in this world one has got living in…
you go 'round exploring in this world…
the creatures have their own lives, so behaviors evolve, while you are playing, & local-ecologies can change while you are away
THAT is object-oriented programming.
Functional doesn’t work that way.
Emergent-complexity is something that OOP produces ( which is why it can be the enemy of managing-complexity ), & pure-functional-programming eradicates.
( I’m differentiating between Class-Hierarchy-Oriented-Programming, like Java, vs everything-is-an-object type programming, like Ruby/Crystal: the book on Object Oriented Programming in Ruby helped me understand the category-difference, though I never finished reading it.
CHOP is brittle, whereas true-OOP isn’t, the same way. )
So, each of those creatures had their own state, their interactions had their-own histories, etc…
That’s OOP.
Choose the tool that’s right for that job, see?
Character-engines need to be OOP!
: )
_ /\ _
( a litle context for people who see that I’ve jumped-in, in-depth, in multiple domains, in this post:
I’m autistic, retired-for-many-years, & fighting-off 3 waves ( in different decades ) of MASSIVE brain-injury, through thinking & forcing-healing … where the medical-profession ordered me to just drug myself into an acceptable psychiatric-zombie, on major-tranquilizers ( like Thorazine/Chlorpromazine ), & wait until I died.
I dig-into EVERYthing I care to understand, & am not satisfied until it makes sense to me, at the grass-roots level I want.
So, yeah: lots of stuff about competent-programming, philosophy sociology, speaker-building, science, space, religions, fluid-dynamics, engineering, functional-design, safety, management-processes, leadership, ALL kinds of stuff!
You get FAR when you spend a 1/2-century studying, while others are socializing, you know?
White medicine told me that me healing was just, itself, my psychiatric-delusion: “healing isn’t possible”, for the literal-brain-decimation I’d experienced as the 2nd wave of brain-injury…
I spent multiple-years much-of-the-time catatonic ( intermittently ), so I’ve been a human-rutabaga ( eyes-open, drooling, nobody-home, fighting-with-all-my-strength-to-EXIST-in-my-brain-for-hours ).
The reason I got better is because I finally decided that they were contradicting evidence-based-medicine, which they were, & set-about engineering healing into me.
I’ve had multiple-comments deleted from this site for “medical misinformation” when I describe the DOABLE EXPERIMENT that people with autism can do, to prove the mitigation that Walsh published, years ago, actually works, … so I’ll not bother trying again:
“evidence-based” medicine means authority-based medicine, as I linked-to with this: https://www.edge.org/response-detail/25433 … & Lemmy.World stands absolutely behind authority-based-medicine-that-calls-itself-evidence-based-medicine, I’ve learned.
That article became a chapter in one of John Brockman’s books, btw, so it isn’t “just” a web-page: it’s properly published, in a book, which you can see here: https://www.kobo.com/us/en/ebook/this-idea-must-die
Anyways, digging into a subject to “sufficient” depth has very different meaning for students-seeking-passing-grade, than it does for an autistic who wants to understand & command a domain’s meanings/knowledge-functions.
Anyways, as I’ve stated on another of my comments, in this post: feel free to block me, site-wide, so you never see any “pollution” of mine, ever again, when logged-in, here.
: )
_ /\ _
I love split fiction (even if we are currently stuck), and really enjoyed it takes two. Do you know of other co-op games that can support a serious gamer and someone who is terrible at gaming (I’m the one who is terrible at gaming)?
Depends how bad terrible is, but here are a few that are less intensive and should be pretty easy to pick up and ones I’ve generally liked (All on PC):
- Baldur’s Gate 3/Divinity Original Sin 1+2 (These are ‘serious’ games but they are turn based strategy so they’re more thinking than reflex)
- BattleBlock Theater
- Castle Crashers
- Cassette Beasts
- Crypt of the NecroDancer (If you don’t got rhythm then this ones hard)
- Guacamelee
- Human Fall Flat
- ibb & obb
- KeyWe
- Kingdom Two Crowns
- Pretty much any Lego game (They are forgiving if you make mistakes but also have more difficult collection hunting if you play it more seriously. They are all very similar though so I’d really only get one or two as you’ll get burned out on them quick)
- Lovers in a Dangerous Spacetime
- Magicka (Is sometimes difficult but also hilarious)
- Octodad: Dadliest Catch
- Overcooked 1/2
- Resident Evil 5/6 (These can have difficult patches but they’re generally not very hard)
- Spiritfarer
- Trine series (I’ve generally liked them all)
There are probably more but I’m not looking at my whole collection right now.
Saved, my bf and I thank you.
If it gives you an idea of how I am, I can play it takes two and trine and I cannot play overcooked.
Overcooked is sort of a funky one because the levels are designed to have you tripping over other players. Depending on the other players, this can be a hilarious or infuriating experience.
It takes two has a huge variety of stuff like platforming and 3rd person shooting, so if you can handle that you can probably handle most of these.
tbf, nobody should ever have to play overcooked. Those games are way too much like having a job.
Super Mario Odyssey 2 player.
Also Galaxy 1 and 2 I guess. Just recently re-released (and overpriced of course).
I sat here for a couple of minutes, trying to think of something I was willing to reveal.
Alright then, keep your secrets!
Username checks out.
in the open source multiplayer game Space Station 14, you can swab pollen from cannabis plants to egg-plants (as in, plants that grow eggs, distinct from eggplant) and have a chance to grow eggs full of pure THC
Everything I’ve heard about that game sounds insane
It’s outstanding. Easily the most fun I’ve had in any sort of multiplayer game in recent memory.
Definitely has learning curves stacked on learning curves, but starting out as a janitor is perfect for learning the ropes
Would I enjoy it if I like Rimworld? Or am I way off base as to what the game even is?
You directly control and roleplay as your own individual character. There’s a ton of different jobs, I like botanist a lot. Superficially its just growing plans for food and medicine, but it can go so very very deep. I can dump mutation chems in plants to give them random genes, I can cross pollinate different plants to spread certain genes, I can increase plant potency with chems too.
A few weeks ago I worked a botany round with another botanist who spent an hour frantically growing and mutating and grinding up plants, all for setting up a gag. She ended up having me drag one of two metal lockers to medbay, where she opened each one and sprayed some water on a large quantity of “kobold cubes”, which all sprang to life at once. Then she set off a grenade which filled medbay with the chemical " corgium". This transformed all the kobolds (and me, briefly) into intelligent corgis. There were a ton of corgis all over the station for the rest of the round.
Bro. What even is this game lol
Love you, botanist being. Please grow wheat and bananas, as the only recipe I’ve memorized is banana bread.
Have you seen my chef knife? Someone stole it!
Isn’t there another one in the vending machine??
The power went out when I was in the freezer, and it wasn’t there when I finally got out!
I look up everything interesting that occurs to me on Wikipedia so I know a lot of shit about random topics.
Not sure the Guardian has enough readers to be so influential in British politics tbh, though it does try
I look up everything interesting that occurs to me on Wikipedia so I know a lot of shit about random topics.
This is a very valuable habit.
The chemical used to stiffen cloth for archival book covers is also used to help snack bars retain their shape.
You mean, like, water?
Methyl cellulose. Also prescribed to relieve constipation!
I’m guessing starch.
Here’s another: the hot-rod/car-racing field is CRAMMED with snake-oil, & the best information is sooo shoddily converted into book-form, that is nearly useless.
David Vizard’s books, & the related books on the domain, are important-to-study, but DEAR G-D is there a RIPE market for anybody who wants to convert all that shit-publishing into quality publishing…
That’s a contributing-factor to why the entire internal-combustion-engine aftermarket is mostly snake-oil bullshit, unfortunately.
I bet the entire internal-combustion-engine industry could have made their engines 10% more efficient, average, had they studied what the inventors/racers had published, & used that information competently…
sigh
the same is true for the general-aviation industry, as a whole.
Notice that the 2 absolute innovators in these 2 domains, were Smokey Yunick & Burt Rutan: anarchists who did more research-engineering than … pretty-much the entire rest of the industry.
IF you want to become competent in sailboat-design, THEN you NEED:
- “The Principles of Yacht Design”, get the most-recent edition of it.
- ALL of Dave Gerr’s books.
- Fossatti’s Aero-Hydrodynamics of Sailing, or whatever that book is called
- probably Nigel Calder’s books, to understand what makes a lifelong sailor value a design-decision
- Tom Cunliffe’s books, to understand the difference between excellent captaining vs “good enough”, & the implications of that, on the design
- a book on windvanes, if you intend to impliment one, on your design ( for cruisers )
- “The Rigger’s Apprentice”, by Brion Toss
- “The Sailmaker’s Apprentice” or something like that, can’t remember, right now…
- the North Sails book on sails/sail-design/sailmaking
- look up the Sharrow propeller, on yt, for power-boats ( annular-box-wing prop, for outboards: no cavitation! )
- Harry Riblett’s book on General Aviation airfoils, available at the Experimental Aviation Association, if you are going to do ANYthing interesting with hydrofoiling ( he nailed the ATR-72 icing problem last-century, & that airfoil’s problem killed an airliner in 2024, with NASA still not admitting the truth about that foil )
- Julia, the programming-language, for doing your math: better than spreadsheets, can use real math symbols, & you aren’t touching any part of the code that you aren’t working-on ( in a spreadsheet, a stray typo can distort the entire sheet, & you can’t find what it is that is skewing everything unless you’re seeing the whole sheet’s equations: it’s the wrong paradigm: error-accumulation, instead of error-eradication. Julia has a learning-track on Exercism, & has a few good books. )
Getting that set of knowledge into one, will save you thousands of wasted dollars, chasing “wild geese”.
For aircraft-design, I’d say begin with Snorri Gudmundsson’s book, NOT Raymer’s.
( Raymer is careless, & you will save yourself much frustration if you avoid his books. Snorri’s is on its 2nd edition, so I’m presuming it to be the go-to book for the industry, nowadays: I can’t afford it, & may not ever, but I wish I’d got Gudmundsson’s book, instead of Raymers, now )
You’ll need Harry Riblett’s book on airfoils, as mentioned above. https://www.kitplanes.com/the-airfoil-adventures-of-harry-riblett/ Notice that the Bearhawk has his foil on it, and its reputation is awesome.
You’ll need this video-playlist, in order to understand just how AWEFUL the interference-drag is, on normal designs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZhyjYE4Le0&list=PLO-XZZWFTH5ELMG3CECqMPZoEFREgwkPn
( I think it was 67HP & 250mph, in level flight, for one of Mike Arnold’s birds. )
Once these things by Mike Arnold & Harry Riblett sink-in, then the normal designs you see in general-aviation … become unconscionable: all that wasted-opportunity, all the needless drag-inefficiency.
Harry Riblett was using Eppler’s simple software, simple simulations, & nowadays you’d HAVE TO use OpenFOAM to do your simulations, XFoil mis-represents stall-onset, apparently, & XFoil is vastly better than what Riblett was using, years ago.
You NEED to understand both Bernoulli’s principle & the Reynolds number, in aircraft-design.
There are sites with video-training for OpenFOAM: CFD/Computational-Fluid-Dynamics’s complicated, & I’d recommend that.
It is entirely possible to design an aircraft, nowadays, on your own, using X-Plane, OpenFOAM, & the choicest study-materials, & YEARS of thinking on it, until your own unconscious-mind groks that-specific-component in the problem, then get digging on the next one…
Further, IF you take into consideration what Riblett & Arnold gave us, THEN you can do better than what most of the new designs in general-aviation are doing.
There is a video, which I now can’t find, on changing Burt Rutan’s Vari-EZ or Long-EZ aircraft to have blended canards, & it noticeably reduced the drag.
That is exactly the sort of thing that Mike Arnold instinctively understood, & if you begin with that kind of instinct, then you … don’t waste the opportunity that the normal aircraft-designers are enforcing.
You need to consider Prandtl wings, too, as that’s beginning to become significant in modern designs.
All the stuff I’ve realized in both these domains is affects patentability, & therefore I’ll not give you that: I want to be able to create a not-for-profit keiretsu which makes both sailboats & aircraft ( a keiretsu is like Panasonic: an organism made of companies, not a single-company ), someday, & patent-protection’s required to break the for-profit monopoly in both industries.
Sorry I’m not just giving you a bunch of answers, instead pointing you at competent-learning-means…
but the world really is better when you learn your-own way, & others learn their-own way, & the results are more … exploring-evolution’s-potential.
Both of these domains will take you under a decade to get from beginning-learning to where you’re really knowing-what-you’re-doing enough to become able to begin competently inventing.
Don’t expect to get to that stage in less than 7y, though.
It took me 8, before everything suddenly fell-into-place, & the different fluid-dynamics-interactions fit together, for different kinds of design, etc…
But I’d rather the world have other-people doing it, … than me knowing, but not doing it, & others thinking that university-courses is the only valid way.
LibreTexts.org iirc is also a place with some good information on it, in the aircraft-design space…
Whatever: IF anybody cares to earn competence in either domain, THEN I hope this boosts you into it, more efficiently.
If not, then just ignore this.
_ /\ _
Forgot this stuff, sorry:
Aviation:
- you need ALL of Mike Busch’s books!
- Barnaby Wainfan, at Kitplanes: read ALL of his stuff. I disagree with some points of his ( & consider his faceted lifting-body aircraft to have been needlessly unsmooth: I like Mike Arnold’s ultra-low-drag paradigm! ), but he gives you sooo much understanding, that you simply aren’t competent in this domain if you aren’t understanding the stuff he’s giving.
- S-Glass is nearly as stiff as carbon, but MUCH tougher: consider it for your wings.
- E-Glass is radar-transparent, the other composites generally aren’t: make any radome of it.
- Turbine-engines cost about 10x as much as piston-engines, to buy, but maintenance-intervals can be MUCH greater, which is why commercial operations like them.
- All aircraft NEED redundant angle-of-attack indicators: fly that indicator, & you’re safe: nearly-all the final-approach-crashes due to stall would have been prevented with AoA-indicators on the flightdeck. ( the McDonnell Douglas 737Max fiasco is because McDonnell Douglas, now falsely-labeled as “Boeing”, they did a reverse-takeover from the inside, after the merger, allowed only 1 AoA-sensor on the airframe, & if that reading went wrong, the avionics highjack the aircraft from the pilots. People died. IN AVIATION, REDUNDANCY SAVES LIVES, for critical-avionics! )
Boats:
- there is the Kelvin Wake Angle that you need to understand: it is the angle from the longitudinal-centerline of your boat, out at an angle, along-which your wake’s peak lies. It is 19.5-ish degrees ( 19.47, iirc ). For multihulls, you NEED to make-certain that that angle doesn’t go from the bow of 1 hull to touch or get too-close to any other hull: it NEEDS to have space, xor you’re creating needless drag. Also, for slenderness, you need to be able to create that angle from your bow, & NOT have your bow’s bluntness violate that angle.
- the LWL:BWL ratios ( Length or Beam, WL means WaterLine ) of interest for multihulls are between 8:1 & 12:1. Going longer than that, as Gerr pointed-out, gives you too-much skin-drag. People who’ve studied aircraft-design know that you want the skin-drag to equal the other kinds of drag, because that’s your minimum-drag. Making a hull 18:1 means you’ve got less bluff-drag, but you’ve got waaay-more skin-drag, so you’re losing, in the displacement regime. Hydroplaning boats are different. Wave-piercing speedboats are different. The multihull designers generally target 9:1 because it really is an optimum LWL:BWL.
- Silicone-Silane is the ONLY anti-fouling that people ought be considering, nowadays ( “Silic One” is 1 brand of that kind of stuff ). NOTHING else works as well, or is as slippery for reducing drag.
- After you’ve earned you real-competence, & now you want to instantiate a business, you’re going to need ABYC membership, & if you’re wanting to sell into the EU, you’re going to need the ISO/DIN standards, which will cost you … about $30k, so you can make your designs compliant with their regulations. They intentionally constructed their standards to enforce as much buying-of-other-components-of-their-standards as possible. To me that is anti-economic-flourishing: putting needless barrier-to-entry, but they’re the ruling institution, so they get to make their economy obey their authority.
- The 1st implimentation of a boat, that vessel’s name, becomes the model’s name, so if you want to control your boat-names, then you can’t have your customers deciding on the name of the 1st implimentation of a design, can you?
- NOLO press makes books on intellectual-property, including Patent It Yourself, which includes a section on getting EU patent protection. Give yourself perhaps a year to get through that book: it’s technical stuff, and there is one hell of alot of stuff to know, in patent-applications, in order to not need to hire ( for $10k+ ) a patent-lawyer for your single application. EU patents are covered in a section of that book, but EU patents cost WAAAY more than North American patents, per point-of-application, or search, etc.
- look at the designs of Cape Falcon Kayaks: they’re elegant in ways that nearly-no boat-designers would do.
- look at the designs of Dave Gerr, if his site is still up, & see how solidly good his work is, compared with normal
- BoatDesign.net is the primary place for boat-design discussion, though … I think it was called “sailing anarchy” was a competitor to it, don’t know if they still exist ( don’t know if either still exists, actually )
- you need to study & understand composites, if you’re doing that, & I’d recommend studying some of the stuff from the aircraft-domain, too ( I got Niu’s composite-airframes textbook ), so you get much-better-than-DIY-“information” about what’s proper. 2" radius minimum for composite-carbon, & that may be pushing it, & you CAN’T mix reinforcement-fibers & get the benefits-of-both: you get the disadvantages of both, not the benefits… this one’s important & non-obvious, so I’m breaking it out into a discussion, not just this little list-point…
Say one has reinforcement-fabric with graphite fiber going east-west & kevlar going north-south.
Then the next layer is with the graphite going north-south & the kevlar going east-west.
Now vacuum-infuse it, so resin spreads forces between all the fibers…
What happens when the temperature rises, in hot sun?
The kevlar SHRINKS. Kevlar has a NEGATIVE Coefficient-of-Thermal-Expansion ( CTE ), but graphite’s is close to zero, & epoxy’s is positive…
So, now your layup is stressing, because some fibers are shrinking, & others are not, & the matrix is expanding.
Worse, when you try flexing it, kevlar isn’t stiff, so NO flexing-force is going onto those fibers, ALL of the flexing-force is going onto the graphite.
But did you calculate your layup so the graphite fibers would be able to take all the flexing that your piece needs to bear?
If not, now it’ll break.
In composites, the stiffest fibers resisting flexing, are taking ALL of the stress of that flexing, until they break, then the next-stiffest are taking all the load.
Mixed reinforcement-fibers is IDIOCY, but you can buy many brands of differently colored aramid+carbon reinforcement-fabric, from many vendors.
It is Niu’s composite-airframes textbook that caused me to know that, & the industry is pushing snake-oil bling, instead.
The only 2 cases where mixed-reinforcement-fibers makes sense, are
- entirely-cosmetic pieces, which bear no structural load, &
- pieces where you’re orienting all the stiffest fibers in 1 particular direction for stiffness in that direction, & you want flex in the other direction, so you use e-glass or something in the bendy-required direction.
Oh, & graphite-fiber’s just thinner, stiffer carbon, generally. Processed at a higher temperature.
There: hopefully I’ve given you enough so that you can compete against me better, in the future.
Salut, Namaste, & Kaizen, eh?
_ /\ _
I feel like there’s some amount of this in every hobby, which sounds like I’m downplaying this take and racing but that’s not that case I promise you.
I can imagine how this would be amplified big time in a pretty expensive hobby/semi-pro/pro? I assume there must exist some amount of pros
But yeah as a collector of a couple to many more likely expensive hobbies, it’s crazy how much shit you see designed to just separate people from their money efficiently
Apart from some episodes of violence, it was stable. But when imperialism ended, it was basically a mess.
Not directly relevant to your question, but for starters you should read about Sykes-Picot. The destabilizing impact of imperialism simply comes after the imperialist force and its vastly superior military leaves. Also you’re thinking of colonialism; imperialism never ended.
Now to directly answer your question, I’m a politics and history guy and the Ottoman Empire doesn’t get nearly enough hate for its role in shaping the modern Middle East. The stagnation they caused that allowed the region to be so easily swallowed by Western imperial interests is a direct result of centuries of Ottoman stagnation and authoritarian incompetence. The janissaries in particular deserve a special place in hell for their role in obstructing any and all progress in the Empire until it was too late. Those fucks are the reason there’s no Ottoman Catherine the Great or Frederick the Great.
Thank you for pointing-out that imperialism & colonialism are distinct.
I’d not understood that clearly.
_ /\ _
There is a “Wilhelm Scream” for TV police radio chatter. It’s a sound effect that you’ve probably heard hundreds of times without realising it. I first encountered it while playing SimCity 3000 and it has bugged me for 20 years because I couldn’t work out what was said.
Here is the soundbite and an extensive list of TV show episodes and movies where it’s been spotted:
Now, I think I cracked it last year:
Please go listen to it for a few times and write down what is being said before you read my analysis
Spoiler
“Beta, scrub for one-forty-eight-nine St Andrews; prowler heard, not seen.”
She’s saying that the Beta (backup) unit(s) should scrub (cancel) their dispatch order to 1489 St Andrews because the alpha unit no longer needs backup. The complainant has said that a prowler (someone lurking outside) was heard, but not seen. Probably the alpha unit suspects it to be a false alarm on that basis.
This is only my guess, based on listening to it 1 billion times, but it seems to fit the context of the soundbite. Why she refers to backup as “Beta” instead of the NATO phonetic “Bravo” is a bit odd, but maybe that’s just her preference, or maybe current NATO phonetic wasn’t as common in policing in the 70s
For me it wasnt the police station but the traffic helicopter saying something half-unintelligible. My brother and I refer to it frequently as “yadda yadda reporting heavy traffic”
I remember this too. Isn’t it just saying “Helicopter one reporting heavy traffic.”?
There’s one for hospital scenes. Noticed it on the opening of Eyes of a Stranger from Operation Mind Crime.
You know you’ve heard this many times.
I first heard it in SC3K also! I just thought it was “Brandon Scott Michael whrregerrarrrfrrr”, as if the VA was just told to mumble a few filler words and then nonsense thereafter
Apparently it’s legit police radio chatter recorded in Los Angeles in the 1970s!
Anyone remotely interested in Japanese music, J-pop, or rhythm games might have seen some music being labelled with something like “BOFU2017” or “BOF:NT” in song names, and a lot of these music have surprisingly high production value. This actually has some rather interesting history
So Beatmania was a DJ simulator rhythm game released by Konami in 1998 that was an inspiration for a lot of music games in the future. The Be-Music Source file format was developed for a community simulator of Beatmania. Later, BMS evolved into essentially its own rhythm game (which anyone can play btw, beatoraja is even available on AUR), and the community forbade players from playing official Konami charts (referred to as “illegal charts”)
In order to increase the amounts of content available for BMS, the community decided to host BMS creation competitions to encourage players to make more BMS… the flagship event is called “BMS of Fighters” (BOF), hosted annually starting from 2004. All music from the events are completely free and libre: as in, free as in both freedom and free beer. And the competition is fierce; a quick search on YouTube will show some top-ranking songs and their production values tend to be very high (… and there are some shitposts too, we don’t talk about Mopemope or that stupid Kirby song)
Obviously because of the libre nature of these competitions, a lot of these songs end up getting picked up by various rhythm games that are not BMS at all. The most popular rhythm games (like DDR, maimai) tend to have a generous collection of the top ranking BOF charts. The low-budget games even more so: when I was in China for two months and saw a lot of local arcade games (basically Chinese clones of maimai, DDR/PIU and Dancerush), guess what songs they have the most! Muse Dash which also started as a Chinese indie game also has a ton of BOF songs; in fact, Blackest Luxury Car, a song which I strongly associate with Muse Dash’s entire identity (they even have a stage modeled after the song), was in fact… a song from BOFU2017
It’s hard to tell but I wouldn’t be surprised if BMS have a wider societal impact on rhythm game music and even the entire Japanese music genre as a whole. A lot of the artists behind top-ranking charts probably got contracts with various rhythm games… or maybe even beyond those. One funny example I know is that one artist became the lead composer of a gacha game that grossed $18M last month; the game in question is almost universally praised for their good soundtracks
As for the BMS themselves… distribution is not centralized whatsoever, especially for less popular songs. Some are on Google Drive, some on OneDrive, some on certain hosting websites, some only in packaged archives that some people are thanklessly maintaining… but anyways it is rather fascinating
Also the 2025 BOF started on October 3rd and is ongoing now. The portal for all BOF events are here: https://bmsoffighters.net/
I was going through my saved comments again, and I want you to know that I very much appreciate you for writing this up. :)













