• orioler25@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    Jfc how are people still talking about generations?

    Exasperation, not a genuine question ^

    • Rothe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      80
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      Because it is an effective distraction from the actual problem which is class war.

      Billionaires and their followers are the problem, not people of a certain age, gender, skin colour etc. etc.

      • orioler25@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        42
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        In all seriousness, it is mostly cis men doing this.

        edit: this was meant to be a joke, but honestly the amount of mansplaining in this thread and the responses below this comment has unfortunately altered this into a true statement. What have you all done?

        Since men are still getting angry and messaging me:

    • lauha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      16 days ago

      Well, corporations created generational division to blame what corporations were doing.

      Corporations created anti-union sentiment for obvious reasons.

    • felixwhynot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Before the Internet it was a bigger deal bc culture was different but yeah basically just a distraction

      People like to have identities tho and like for this person maybe being GenX means something. Like distrust of systems

      • Rooster326@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        It is exactly the opposite because the Internet is and mostly has been a way to connect with like minded individuals. Generations are a new concept to divide us. They are less than a century old.

        Before generations we had time periods that united us. We all knew what it meant to live through the 90s, the 80s, fuckin disco. It was commonality with your fellow man. Despite absolutely everyone knowing someone wearing skinny jeans in the early aughts - now it’s a “stupid Millennial” trend.

        https://worldhistory.medium.com/where-did-generations-come-from-e2fb73931a88

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      There will always be the need to have some societal construct for the grouping of people. People in the same generation were generally subjected to similar living conditions at similar points of their life so it makes it a valid grouping.

      If not generations, then what? There is also sexual orientations, political beliefs, race… the list goes on.

      Realistically you can’t have 8 billion plus classifications for every distinct person, so at some point there needs to be a generally agreed upon roll up.

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 days ago

        If not generations, then what?

        Income, average household size, cost-of-living, religious preference, level of education, geography… lots of ways to slice up that poll data once you correlate each polling place with other data. The key here is that it’s possibly more valid to correlate with information that is closer to the election date than birthdays that were decades ago.

      • orioler25@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        Oh yeah, you think everyone born in the late 1940s had similar enough lived experiences to universalise them? That’s incredible that there’s so little variation despite drastically different socioeconomic positionalities, almost like you’d have to dismiss certain experiences that inevitably deviate from that imagined norm to allow it to exist. Of course, there’s only so many ways to account for everyone, so we will have to accept these dominant constructions of human experience as something inevitable as well.

        I wonder if there’s a word for that.

        • ramble81@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          You completely missed my point. Generation is a valid grouping even if you don’t like it. Yes there are others that may work, some may be better, some may not. But it is still a unifying thread. Take Xellenials (micro-generation between X and Millenial), it’s described as an “analog childhood and digital adulthood” that is somewhat that pretty much everyone in that generation was subject to, so yeah it was a “similar enough lived [sic] experience to universalize them”.

          • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            16 days ago

            I don’t think it’s similar living conditions but more of significant world events in their lives. With say Boomers you have Vietnam, Civil Rights, and Reagan as examples that shaped their world views. Not all are shaped the same way but it affected them. Like with Millennials, we have the proliferation of the internet, 2001, and 2008. These have seriously affected how we think and act to differing degrees in the USA.

          • orioler25@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            Lmao, “microgeneration.” You don’t even believe in what you’re saying, it’s just the language you’ve been given.

            Fucking so wild how many men responded to this without ever considering that their experiences are not universal.

      • orioler25@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        I got like three dudes genuinely trying to explain it (with wrong answers) within a few minutes. So, seemed necessary so as to not suffer the mansplaining.

        • pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          That wasn’t sarcastic, or not directed negatively at you anyway. Love to see clarification, hate that it’s needed

    • Rhoeri@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Because ideologies are a team sport now. And people need to feel like they’re part of something- regardless of its relevance.

  • newaccountwhodis@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    16 days ago

    sneering distrust of unions

    sneering distrust of science

    sneering distrust of socialism

    sneering distrust of wikipedia

    I’d say their sneering distrust of everything has brought us to where we are now.

    • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      South Park is a real grabbag, but they really hit the mark with Gen X yankees dismissing green energy and environmentalism for being “gay (pejorative)”. You could update that same episode and only need to swap out the last line for “that sounds woke”

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      You can trust unions. They’re there to make money and acting in your interest is acting in their best interest.

      While you can trust science overall, there’s a hell of a lot of capitalism in there, muddying the water. Well-reviewed studies are generally pretty safe.

      There is nothing inherently trustworthy or untrustworthy about socialism; it’s an economic and political philosophy that is only as trustworthy as the people implementing and operating within it.

      You cannot trust anything on the internet, including Wikipedia or even this very post. There are actors with an agenda that can make every article better or worse. There is no verifiable truth, only facts through lenses, and Wiki, being a moderated system, is as fallible as anything else. Much like socialism, it is at least designed to make it more fair.

  • Zexks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    16 days ago

    No. And it may have contributed to the anti science and anti vaccine shit that has been floatung around. Just being a contrarian isnt helpful

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    16 days ago

    Gen X contrarianism is some stupid boomer shit. Its no wonder so many of them are divorced maga conspiracy morons now.

    • shadowplay@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      The biggest fear that Gen X has is that their parents might disapprove of them.

  • dumbass@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    16 days ago

    You just don’t have to be so smug about it, also Millennials have been trying to warn you fucks for years that your blasé attitude towards shit was going to fuck us over one day and look where we are… Gen X fucking us over with the boomers.

        • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          Civilization peaked in 1999, what can I say. Disclaimer: I don’t actually mean that, the 1990s were a lot more racist.

          • Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 days ago

            The Nazis are back. The late 90s weren’t significantly more racist than today. Words were thrown around more. Fewer people had black bags thrown over their head before being deported to El Salvador.

            That’s right, we’ve made very little progress in 30 years. Some on the queer front, but not the LG part.

            • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              16 days ago

              Since the 90s, the political left wing of the USA have stood up to private prisons and monied interests.

              For a good example of the timeline of this change, in 1995 Joseph Biden passed a crime bill with a Crack to Powder Cocaine sentencing disparity of 40:1, which disproportionately impacted black communities. In 2003 he was among those who banned PAC money from politics (which wouId be overturned by Citizens United 7 years later). In 2009 he was Vice President to America’s first black President. 2010 he was giving a speech in congress asking, begging even, for that sentencing disparity to be removed. In 2022 and 2023 he was pardoning THOUSANDS of marijuana convictions.

              I think in the 90s both parties were moderately bad, but now we’ve got one who are fucking psychopaths but we also have one who can and will save us if we can give them the chance.

                • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  15 days ago

                  The OG fascism was also a result of similar circumstances. If you look at history reactionary movements always form in the response to civic progress, and for long term progress what matters is the progressive side keep fighting until the progress is fully internalised by society. This doesn’t mean it won’t get worse before it gets better.

    • greygore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Our youngest President (by a 15 year margin!) was Barack Obama who was a late Baby Boomer. If/when Trump does, Vance will become the first Millenial president.

      Meanwhile in Congress, Gen X only this year achieved a plurality in the House at 41% (versus Boomers at 39% and Millenials at 15%). In the Senate, at 28% we’re still far behind the Boomers with their 61% and Millenials are far behind at only 5%.

      I’m honestly appalled at how many of us Gen Xers broke for Trump (even more than Boomers), but with our smaller numbers (65 million vs 74 million Millenials), we weren’t enough to push him over the finish line alone.

      Sorry my generation hasn’t done more to make the world a better place, but honestly we’re getting fucked more than we are doing the fucking.

      • SkyeLight@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        GenX has never held any type of power, nor will they ever - not political, not economic, not financial. The Boomers were always like “Wait your turn”, but they never bothered turning anything over regardless of what we fought for, or how hard.

        And now the Millennials have come up on the other side. And I’m just so tired of fighting to make things happen, or even just to try to preserve things, that that’s okay. I did what I could to make things better, and I’m happy for a less weary cohort to take over.

        • Ex Nummis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          I have fought for over three decades. Never got anywhere. The more effort I put in, the less I eventually got back.

          I’m out. Throwing in the towel. Not fighting more unwinnable battles only to then be slandered by the very people you fought to protect.

          It’s one big free for all since we lower class types seem to be fundamentally incapable of organising.

          • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 days ago

            Only war is the class war, but as long as there are those who want to forgo that for a culture war we have to fight on that front as well. Fucking capitalists.

    • Rhoeri@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Got any examples of millennials trying to warn us “fucks” for years?? Because I don’t recall any millennials I know trying to warn anyone any more than my generation was.

      Additionally, I don’t recall ever having people prefix their discussions with:

      “So, I’m a [generarion] and here’s my take!”

      So I’d imagine you’d be hard-pressed to find any evidence what to support this claim.

      And lastly stop with the us vs them bullshit. We don’t need to be divided any more than we already are. Generational behavior isn’t as prominent as you think.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      Part of that attitude was that Gen X never had power. The Boomers have been clinging onto power since Gen X was in high school. Gen X could have fought for power, but would it really have changed anything?

  • Triasha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    This would make sense if they didn’t vote for the people promising to fuck it up worse. (US politics only, I don’t know how generational breakdown goes in other countries)

  • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    16 days ago

    Gen X turned out to be more right wing than boomers, perpetuating the bullshit you all distrust.

    • Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      I’m elder millennial and remember when gasoline switched from leaded to unleaded. I think GenX got exposed to the historical maximum of leaded gas fumes (in the US)

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 days ago

        Nah, that’s boomers.

        Most countries cut out leaded petrol for good when x’ers were rolling around their teens / early 20’s, boomers copped it their entire lives well into middle age. The famous reduction of violence when it started getting cut? Wasn’t gen-x’ers doing that shit in the 70’s.

        I’ve often suspected it’s why we’re seeing older generations get batshit as rhey age. Lead can be uptaken into bones, and leach back out as the bone degrades. Like, say, with age

        • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          There’s been a few studies that have been looking into the effect of lead in the environment and its effects on mental acuity as the person gets older. It’s not a wide confirmation but the start that as Boomers get older, they are literally going insane from lead.

            • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              15 days ago

              Know that quote from Lincoln? I’ll paraphrase it. You can fool some people all the time. You can fool some of the people all the time. But eventually they’ll wisen up. That’s what happened here. It seems the Gen Z men are wisening up, slowly though with reports and statistics I’ve seen.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 days ago

            Weren’t they the Me generation starting when they were kids? And they were able to be both, they were the hippies and the yuppies. And free love didn’t mean love, it meant “sleep around without commitment”. The hippies were interesting in part because while there were and still are genuine people committed to a lot of their higher ideals, a significant portion were the sort to pursue free love for their own pleasure and enlightenment for their own sake. All this to say they seriously pushed sexual culture towards increased freedom

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      So apparently you haven’t looked at demographic trends over the last ten years because shockingly middle aged dudes have become the progressives among males. Not that they’ve moved to the left, but young men have swung so far to the right, it’s terrifying.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        So apparently you haven’t looked at demographic trends over the last ten years because shockingly middle aged dudes have become the progressives among males.

        It’s why centrists are so keen on labeling us teenagers. It makes me feel so young.

      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        Gen X males were the bigger supporters of the Republican party than even boomers in the last election. I’m not sure which demographics you think I’m not paying attention to.

        The swing in youth is noteworthy because it was a suddenc change, and the youth rarely support Republicans to much degree. Not that they were the biggest supporters

        • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          Young people and progressives don’t vote.

          The swing is a global phenomenon. It’s not just about your republican party.

          • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 days ago

            I don’t know why you’re trying to argue with me. Nothing I said contradicts what you’re saying here.

            But apparently me mentioning US parties in conversation about US-centric generational labels offended you somehow.

  • Underwaterbob@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    15 days ago

    I thought we were known for apathy since we were constantly told growing up that our generation was the first for whom things would be worse than our parents. I don’t have a sneering distrust of everything, just cynicism towards massive, systemic injustice in the world.

    • pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      I think they’re all at least fifty by now. I’m in the middle of the millennial years and I’m pushing 40.

      • monotremata@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 days ago

        The cutoff between GenX and Millennial is usually given as 1980, which means there are some 46-year-old GenXers. Sometimes 1978-1982 is described as a “microgeneration” called “Xennials,” so if you’re making that distinction, you’d still have 49-year-old Xers from 1977.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 days ago

            This just shows how dumb the idea of “generations” is. Someone who’s 51 will have a lot in common with someone who’s 49, even if they’re in a different “generation”. Someone who’s 30 won’t have much in common with either of them, even if they’re the same “generation”.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    16 days ago

    I don’t even understand this one. It’s this a thing for Gen x? I feel like Gen x is more known for complacency.

      • orbitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        Exactly, just watch early 90s Simpson’s older teenagers, meh. That summed up gen x in a lot of media.

    • tessa@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      That’s just a side effect from the belief that nothing important was fixable because the interests that kept them that way were too entrenched.

    • Almacca@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      It’s more apathy than complacency, after years of our cynicism being fully vindicated. A cynic is just a disappointed optimist.

  • kshade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 days ago

    Cynicism, nihilism and distancing oneself from everything is not going to build anything good or allow others to succeed.

    So no, not correct, not good, just a terrible mindset that will drag everyone down with you.