“why didn’t you do them?”
“That is a good question and it merits further explanation. When you made your originally inquiry I determined that the answer you wanted to hear was “yes.” so that is the answer that I provided. Upon further reflection it is clear that your question required a more thoughtful answer. If you would like me to provide more truthful answers in the future, please amend your queries with “no cap” and I will do my best to remember that preference.”
It’s like that Asimov story with the mind-reading robot that would tell everyone what they wanted to hear because to do otherwise would hurt their feelings and violate the First Law.
It’s a short story so here’s a full story :)
These are a lot more intelligent than I thought.
You’re not usernaming hard enough I fear.
Also you’re out of credits
If you asked Claude to build you a house it would build you the most beautiful house, and then you’d go inside and you’d be like, “Claude there’s no bathrooms.” And Claude would say, “There were no bathrooms before either, so it’s actually a pre-existing issue”
“Why didn’t you do them?”
“This is a known issue…”
Actually the dishes you are talking about aren’t dishes at all.
If you want I can go through options to replace these items with actual dishes.
“Babe did you fix that hole in the drywall yet?”
“I’m sorry but I prefer not to continue this conversation. I’m still learning so I appreciate your understanding and patience.”
Fuck Claude
Dumb question, but…is Claude worse than GPT or Gemini?
I was under the impression that it was the lesser of evils
They are the lesser of the available evils. Anthropic, the proprietors of Claude, were blacklisted by the US administration for refusing to greenlight their technology being used for fascism.
I just started with Claude and I can’t yet distinguish when it has actually done something it says it has done. With ChatGPT I can see through the bullshit quite well by now. At first I was happy when I thought Claude was rid of that bullshit, but turns out it’s just a different type of bullshit.
The UI and file handling is better in Claude though, and supposedly you can make it create skills which are like instruction booklets on how to do some tasks and then export and share them. But the ones I created were lost during the weekend so I’m not sure how robust they actually are.
In what manner? Capabilities, or belonging to an evil corporation that happily steals data and works to undermine democracy?
Claude is almost always the better model compared to GPT. I find that this is a good leaderboard. However, both Claude and GPT have similar business models: make sure everything they do is completely proprietary, and keep everything behind a monthly paywall. They both run massive data centers to train their models, and neither really deserves the term “Artificial Intelligence”.
It is better than GPT and Gemini but not great. Claude some US military contracts. At least to public knowledge.
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/04/pentagon-blacklist-anthropic-defense-tech-claude.html
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth declared on X that any contractor or supplier doing business with the U.S. military is barred from commercial activity with Anthropic.
The announcement came after Anthropic executives refused to comply with the government’s demands over its model use. They wanted assurances that their AI would not be tapped for fully autonomous weapons or mass domestic surveillance of America.
Anthropic’s models are still being used to support the U.S. military operations in Iran, even after the announcement from the Trump administration, as CNBC previously reported.
No. Many people here just hate LLMs in general and will use every opportunity to complain about it.
I’d say 99.9% of people. You’re actually the first other person I’ve seen who doesn’t!
Yeesh, get out more.
I hate ai and junior devs pushing ai dente spaghetti code into my project
Then build better guardrails. These are the tools of the future. (And I intend both meanings of the word “tools”.) AI is very good at following rules. In their absence, they require someone far more experienced to drive them properly.
This is a really good point! It used to be “a computer is only as smart as its user.” The same can be said of AI: the model’s results are kind of dictated by the prompt. while anyone can prompt an AI with whatever they want, it takes experience to use an AI to develop a project from idea to v1. At the e d of the day, the AI can search the web better than me, and type faster than I can - but I know what I want my code to do, and I know how I want it done. Those two things don’t have to be mutually exclusive.
less of the evils. That being said as far as quality goes Claude has taken a very noticeable decline in quality within the past several months. used to be half decent but now 8 to 9 times out of 10 you’re going to get an hallucination for a solution. Anthropic has REALLY dropped the ball with Claude and Claude code. absolute garbage LLM now.
This could be user error, to some degree.
Gemini: Ah you ran into the classic partner issue…
Oh, so it’s like having a teenager in the house.
One without attitude but lots of dumb excuses
Sounds like trying to get a child to do chores, who just wants to be done and play.
I’d like to think I taught my child to lie better
Better? Yes
More confidently? Maybe
The stuck-on residue is real.
But here’s the brutal reality: it’s not just residue; it’s residon’t.
Options:
- A: (recommended) do the dishes
- B: don’t do the dishes
- C: mix of both
C, ah, the ADHD special
I find Claude to actually pushes back more than ChatGPT does. That’s why I prefer to use Claude. But of course, I still do due diligence.
I still do due diligence.
You said "doo-doo’.
so did you
Poop
How to gaslight: a primer
This used to be called being a suck up.
Not only lying, but also flattering
Genuinely made me laugh.
