[blue]
If you could push a button that gives you a hundred thousand dollars but a random person dies, would you do it? 

[yellow, cautious]
Interesting thought experiment… intuitively, I’d say no, but it’s worth thinking about… it’s a genuine moral dilemma in a capitalist world: there’s a dialectic between our desires and the common good…

MEANWHILE, BILLIONAIRES

[an orange guy in a suit is shown with a terrifying grin pushing as many buttons as possible at once on a table, slamming one of the buttons, and even using their foot to press an extra one]

https://thebad.website/comic/the_totally_hypothetical_button_thought_experiment

  • Bad@jlai.luOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    2 months ago

    Apologies to all the foot fetishists, I eventually gave up trying and thus have failed you.

    Guess I have new anatomy lessons to grind. Shit’s hard yo.

    • stray@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      I like that it’s not a realistic human foot. Sometimes art should capture the idea of a thing rather than just the superficial image of the thing, you know? It has character.

      • Bad@jlai.luOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ll keep that one in mind, next time someone criticizes my anatomy I’ll tell them “son, it has character”.

        Actually I need to repeat that bit to myself until I am convinced. Feels like a healthy mantra.

    • Asafum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      A streamer artist guy says pretty often that you can spend as much time on a foot as the entire rest of the character. Apparently that’s how difficult feet are to draw properly lol

    • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Foot: just a stupid, broken hand with tiny fingers and a super fucked up fused wrist. What’s so hard about that? (This is a joke, my foot drawings also look fucked. What even are feet?)

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You could do a version where he’s wearing shoes and is fully on the button board, chair discarded in the background and he’s basically just playing Twister with the button board

  • bizarroland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Honestly, a billionaire would probably hire people to push the button for them.

    They’d minimize explaining what the button does, and then pay them like $100,000 a year to push the button 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 52 weeks a year.

    • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why would they get payed that much? this is unskilled labor, they get minimum wage.

      That, or they hire an undocumented immigrant for even less. Extra bonus because they can’t read the sign that explains the killing thing.

      • bizarroland@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I was basing it off of an estimated $15 an hour minimum wage, which is pretty common in a couple of states, where there tend to be more billionaires.

        15 times 24 times 365 is like $130,000.

        • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh no, that’s what salaries are for. That way they pay them for 8 hours of work still.

          This should be celebrated though, because they get to go home early if all the work gets done.*

          .*The work is done when the billionaire has enough ** money.

          **Enough is defined as every particle of matter being converted into wealth for the god emperor formally known as billionaire.

    • Orygin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 months ago

      Exactly, just create the conditions and system so that not pushing the button results in poverty and people will line up to push it

    • Derpenheim@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      One person would get through 1 billion people in 30 years. It would take 120 people pushing it every second of the year to make it a 50/50 that billionaire is killed.

  • turdas@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 months ago

    You’d have to kill 10,000 people to become a billionaire this way. Obvious fact perhaps, but it’s easy to forget how unnecessarily much a billion dollars is.

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    More interesting (and more realistic) if it isn’t a guarantee that someone dies if you push the button, but a probability.

    Would you push the button if it was a 20% chance someone dies? A 5% chance? A 1% chance? 0.1%? Is there a number where it’s ok to push the button? If it was a 0.0001% chance, how many times would you push the button?

    Also, does it change things if you know that your button push resulted in someone’s death? Is it different if it’s someone standing right there? Maybe on the other side of a one-way mirror? What if it’s just that you get a green light or a red light after you push the button and you don’t have to see someone die or know who died or how they died?

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        same could be said about taking a steamy shit on the toilet. 8-10% of all cardiac emergencies happen in the bathroom.

        sometimes you get the stinky fudge dragon, other times the stinky fudge dragon gets you.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Though the chance someone other than you dies from you taking a shit is pretty far fetched, and I’m not liking having to try to conceive of how that happens.

          But a lot of activities are this way. Getting on a ladder in public could kill someone, just breathing around other people could kill someone, etc etc.

    • qarbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d say at sub-0.1% chances of killing someone, I’d press with impunity. At those low probabilities, they’ve basically just got hit by lightning at the same time I’ve pressed a random button.

      Granted I’d probably only do it whenever the 100K ran out, so once every couple years. Unless my investments die.

    • sfgifz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Also factor in when they die. Maybe your action results in a demise after a period of time. Lung Cancer won’t kill someone right after they puff a cigarette, so the cigarette baron may not consider it his fault in the sort term.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, that would be an interesting twist. 100% chance that pushing the button kills someone, but it might happen in 2 years or it might happen in 30 years. But, even if someone lives a perfectly normal life for 30 years, their cause of death will be this button.

      • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It isn’t the “cigarette baron’s” fault any more than the beer baron’s fault or the parachute maker’s fault. Some people are going to die if they choose to indulge in mildly risky behavior. If the scenario is something like this, everyone here will be pushing that button. Don’t say you won’t because you will.

    • angband@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      The problem with statistics is that 20% of people in a large population absolutely will die. At least in the context of this meme, the statistics used are gathered from real world data - deaths from cancer, lack of treatment, poor working conditions.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        100% of people in a large population absolutely will die. I don’t know why you think some people are immortal. I also don’t know what that has to do with this meme.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    billionaire would hire multiple persons to press the button and give the money to them while paying basically nothing for it.

  • Foxfire@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    He can afford foreshortening and detailed hands, in a stickman world‽ His greed sickens me.

  • valar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’d hope it would take a lot more than $100,000 for most people. That won’t even get you a house.

  • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    The more I look at this, the more unhinged it becomes. None of the buttons are organized, the billionaire has a giant toe for a foot, and I keep thinking the billionaire has six fingers instead of five.

    Prefect amount of unhingedness. 10/10.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      i mean, give me a 90% chance of kills me and i’m still pressing the button.

      Hell, give me a 100% chance. That’d solve more of my problems than any amount of money.

      • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Depending on how rich you are, $100,000 might do exactly nothing to your lifestyle, but dying would.

        Risk reward. Someone with nothing, but living in an extremely low cost of living area, might end up with life changing, never have to work again money (assuming it’s able to be used with no loopholes), but a billionaire couldn’t even find the change buried in their day to day noise of the market changes.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Once you’re a billionaire, no amount of money will impact your lifestyle, but they keep hoarding wealth anyway.

          There are people who become billionaires and it’s not their fault. They inherited money, or their company explodes and is suddenly worth ungodly money, so I don’t necessarily subscribe to the idea that there’s no way for a moral person to become a billionaire.

          But there’s absolutely no moral excuse for remaining a billionaire or seeking additional wealth.

  • Shindo66@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    I actually just thought about this same analogy a bit ago. Most normal people it would be a hard no, but there are some out there that would do it for $1k and their first question would be “can i hook it up to an auto-clicker?”

    • binarytobis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Most normal people it would be a hard no

      You have a lot more faith in humans than I do. If nobody would know, I’d be shocked if more than 50% said no.

  • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have an alternative idea fom a meme.

    Blue says: “if you could push a button that gives you a hundred million dollars but a random billionaire dies, would you do it?”

    Then simply switch yellow and the billionaire.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    hundred thousand? naw.

    hundred million. sure. I could actually do some good for the world with that.

    I would troll the fuckin shit out of billionaires and shitty corpofascist with every penny.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Think about how much more you could troll them if you turned that into a billion! Besides, you’ve got bills to pay. And these taxes are obscene, that money has already been taxed a thousand times! You’ve taken on quite the burden and deserve to live a little.

  • elbiter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Billionaire would press the button for 100 bucks, then spend 100 times the amount in a pair of shoes he’ll never wear.

    • jafra@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t believe in this being hypothetical anymore.

      I guess the billionaire only cares if the death can be attributed to his actions (juristically). Everything else and it doesn’t matter.

      • youcantreadthis@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        They all rape children and we all know they all rape children why do you think they care about laws applying to them