Let’s have a lunch and learn!

  • Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    Any mention of “family” and I’m out. You aren’t my fucking family. I barely tolerate any of you, and I only go that far because I am forced to participate in this bullshit just so I can feed and shelter myself. Just give me my project, shut your dick sheath, and let me grind my life away in silence.

    On a totally unrelated note, “team player”.

  • Einar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    149
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Alright, team, let’s circle back and ensure we’re fully aligned on our north star objectives. We need to leverage synergy, engage in blue-sky thinking, and touch base on our pain points to drive mission-critical outcomes. But let’s not boil the ocean with unnecessary jargon - at the end of the day, we need to optimize our bandwidth for real, value-driven impact. If we keep moving the needle with this kind of thought leadership theater, we risk losing sight of our core competencies and drowning in a sea of meaningless buzzwords. Let’s pivot toward clear, actionable insights and sunset the overuse of strategic messaging before it becomes a blocker to true innovation. Instead of just playing the fast-follow game with every trending framework, let’s focus on original, high-impact execution that actually drives results.

    Thoughts? Chris, do you have any builds?

    No?

    Good. Then let’s action this and drive it across the finish line!

  • yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 days ago

    Here at Lemmy, we are steadfastly committed to leveraging our core competencies in order to drive strategic alignment across all functional units. Our focus remains unwavering on fostering a culture of continuous innovation and optimizing synergies that propel us towards achieving scalable growth and value creation for our stakeholders. By embracing agile methodologies and harnessing cutting-edge technologies, we endeavor to stay ahead of the curve, ensuring robust ROI while maintaining unparalleled customer-centricity in every facet of our operations.

    Should you have any further inquiries or require additional insights into our visionary pursuits, please do not hesitate to connect with us. Together, let’s pioneer new paradigms and redefine excellence!

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 days ago

    I still hate “leverage” used as a synonym for “use.” “We leverage technologies” yeah sure, when was the last time you had your asshole leveraged?

    • Rose@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      Next biz bro bestseller: “Leverage the power of your bowels to produce fertiliser that promotes growth”

  • janus2@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    “pAiN pOiNtS”

    these are not knots in muscles they are severe institutional shortcomings and failings that are draining us all, making us want to jump ship, hazardous, and in some cases even making the company lose profit but you fuckheads just want to write down pAiN pOiNtS and jerk yourselves and the shareholders off instead of actually doing ANYTHING MEANINGFUL

  • feddup@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Leadership at the company I work for started saying “let’s double click that” to mean let’s go into more detail on that topic. Hate it.

    Also “let’s take this offline” which just means let’s have a different meeting about it, it’ll still be online because we’re all remote.

    • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      Also “let’s take this offline” which just means let’s have a different meeting about it, it’ll still be online because we’re all remote.

      See, I would think that would mean for more individual discussion, as in “this isn’t relevant to this meeting, why don’t you and I talk about this after the meeting or at a later point.”

      I think everyone has those coworkers who see meetings as an opportunity to ask about things with no relevance to anyone else in the room and makes everybody sit through 10 minutes (per discussion) about an issue that only pertains to them, instead of just going to the manager/whatever’s office in their own time to ask about their personal situation.

      If it’s just to table it until another meeting, though, that doesn’t make any sense.

      • feddup@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I think in many cases it results in separate discussion over slack, probably between managers but it still often ends up in a follow up meeting.

    • renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      In my experience, “take this offline” means they don’t want to have the discussion in front of present company.

      For example, mentioning anything less-than-ideal in a meeting in front of large groups. It’s basically a thinly veiled way to control morale through selective information.

      • feddup@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        I guess it depends on the company, so far mine it’s just making more meetings but keeping the current one focused. I’m fine with that, just hate the expression because it only makes sense if the follow up meeting was in person but we’re all remote

        • insaneinthemembrane@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Looks like everyone has ignored that you’re talking about the expression not the act. I also hate take it offline, I’ll just say… this sounds like a separate meeting.

    • steeznson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      Oh snap I should have read more comments before posting about “double clicking”. I hate it.

      I’ve been hearing “velocity” a lot recently and that also makes me cringe.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      The first one is an Abomination unto Nuggan. I’m OK with the second one being used in a meeting to divert a topic that needs covered but is getting off tack.

    • sibannac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Take it offline as in turning it off? “We’re taking the service offline” or “Let’s talk about this face to face?”

      • feddup@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Nope, all in a teams meeting discussing something, topic diverges or becomes too complicated and is slowing the meeting. Manager says “let’s take this offline” or “we’ll discuss offline”. Keeps the meeting focused but I hate the phrase. It’s not offline because it’ll just be another teams meeting!

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Do you have a better way to phrase it? I usually see this to mean “focus on this topic rather than get distracted. We can discuss that later” … or I guess that’s a better way to phrase it

      • feddup@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        Let’s take that offline perhaps better as let’s discuss that separately/later.

        Double clicking should just be something like “to go into more detail” or something. I get why it happens, easy and quick to say, i just find it so irritating.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          let’s discuss that separately/later

          That can come off as, “Not now dumbass.” The new slang comes off as, “Yeah, needs covered, and we will, but not now.”

          As always though, it’s all in the tone.

  • Nyticus@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 days ago

    The whole “we’re a family” motto. I never understood why this is a thing and why it should be a thing. There is no job that I’ve ever been comfortable getting that attached to.

  • dukeofdummies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    6 days ago

    I heard “rightsizing” for the first time last year.

    I have no idea what knucklehead PR dumbass came up with that but it made the following layoffs even more unpalatable.

    • Landless2029@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      The only time I hear rightsizing is for cloud resources. I’ve never heard of it in human resources. That sucks.

    • dumples@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Typical double click request is as follows:

      Manager: Leadership wants a “double click” on the numbers on slide 8.
      Doer: What do they want to see.
      M: Well they wanted to see more about the numbers on slide 8 they thought it was interesting.
      D: What number? Interesting how?
      M: They want a double click? Does that work? How long will that take?
      D: ummm a week?

      • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        It just sounds forced to me.

        It’s never said by people who created this slang as kids growing up with computers, it’s like managers who just invented it in their 40somethings.

        Like they’re trying to be cool, but it’s just not cool

    • adoxographer@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      This one comes from Excels Pivot tables, where you double click to see the source data, but it got picked up and bastardized