• Manticore@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I’m reminded of a story somebody shared on reddit years ago.

    An arborist, working with his team. One of his crew had the chainsaw kick and come back and severely main him. He’s bleeding so fucking fast. They need to get him to hospital, and they can’t afford to wait for the ambulance to arrive.

    The woman in front won’t let them past. She’s going slower and slower to make a point. They’re honking at her, but she lines up with another lane to box them in. That car slows down too.

    The guy is fading fast.theyre using his shirt to staunch the blood, but it’s not enough. After several minutes, they finally have an opening they can take. They speed past her little car, throwing the bloodsoaked shirt out the window to slap wetly on her windshield.

    They meet up with emergency services - first, a cop. The woman pulls over to talk to the cop about their reckless driving. While arguing, the ambulance arrives. The injured crew member, and the storyteller, are taken to hospital.

    It’s too late. He dies.

    …don’t fuck around man. You never know. It’s no worth it. Do the safe thing and make space or pull over. Safety over spite.

  • MycarHolmes@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    144
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    70 in a 50 zone. Doesn’t matter if its km/h or mph, that’s just idiotic.

      • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        The engineers only make the designed safe speed. Government officials make the listed limit. It used to be EXTREMELY popular for government official to knock 20-25% off the design limit of the road, ironically so they can tell everyone how safe they were.

        • kameecoding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          6 days ago

          Traffic engineers in the US make too wide roads that psychologically encourages speeding, the posted speed limit doesn’t matter unless police dedicates significant resources to enforcing it

        • theangryseal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Everywhere in my town was 25mph until about 10 years ago.

          A local politician got a few speeding tickets and went nuts over it, now it varies from 25-60mph. Engineers were brought in to advise on safe limits.

          Him getting those tickets was one of the best things that ever happened to me. It was so miserable driving so slow on big open roads. I could probably sit down and figure up an insane amount of time I’ve saved over the last decade (if I weren’t an idiot).

          • teuniac_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Not so great for people walking or cycling though. Higher speeds mean more serious and fatal collisions.

            Where these modes of transport mix, 20mph is becoming the default choice in western European countries, there is a global declaration on this. If roads feel like they’re made for higher streets: that’s bad infrastructure design.

            https://www.fiafoundation.org/news/stockholm-declaration-focuses-on-reducing-urban-speed

            • theangryseal@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              5 days ago

              No one is traveling on a bicycle or walking here. These roads are empty, there’s nothing there. I live in one of the most rural places in the country (United States).

              It was seriously 20 miles straight with no houses, wide road, 25 mph. In residential areas there are still 25 mph speed limits.

              On our 4 lane road, bicycles are not allowed, yet the speed limit was only 35-40.

              Where there are sidewalks, the speed limit is 25 mph. If there are buildings, 25 mph.

              Empty roads with nothing but fucking trees should not be 25 mph.

              In all of my years driving on those roads, I don’t even think I’ve ever seen a bicycle. A couple of those tiny, slow motorcycles, maybe. I guess they call them scooters

              • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 days ago

                And why do you think this is the case? Could it possibly be because the infrastructure is completely designed for cars, and using anything else is just not safe so you’d have to be a madman to go with these options?

                Imran sure, I get rural, cars are good for rural areas, but not for towns etc.

                • theangryseal@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Well, I mean, if a person wants to ride a bike 40 miles for 4 1/2 hours to the nearest Walmart I’m sure they could.

                  About 4,500 people live here and most of them have cars or they’re stuck.

                  We have public transit but about 30 people use it. My neighbor said it’s a 2.5 hour ordeal to go to the post office when he could be there and back in 20 minutes in a car. He got old and lost his license.

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Engineers should absolutely include traffic calming features to get people to naturally slow down, but everyone should drive the limit.

        Speed kills, kinetic energy is not linear.

        Cars are tonnes of metal hurtling down the road. Thousands upon thousands die every year, and since the increased prevalence of massive US style trucks fatalities have RISEN, undoing decades of progress. (Both in the US, and elsewhere)

        People driving 20 over the limit are arseholes (or have been influenced by car centric infrastructure and culture). Change my mind.

        Speeding is never okay. Just that lots of people have convinced themselves it’s no big deal.

        Edit because of downvotes: https://www.bts.gov/content/motor-vehicle-safety-data

        Y’all are really justifying some shitty behaviour. Yeah, I get it, streets are designed shittily, and feels like it’s fine to speed (especially, from what I can see, in the US), but this doesn’t absolve you from doing the right thing.

        Like, if it were 5 (km/h) over, I could perhaps forgive you. But downvoting me for suggesting 20 mph over is arsehole behaviour? You don’t deserve a licence.

        Fuck these carbrains putting their feelings over completely savable lives.

        USA is cooked (and Australia, somewhat cooked, since people are buying ridiculously sized cars here too).

        Don’t speed, you fuckwits. Better yet, take public transport if you live in a city with cilivised transportation (obviously, not your fault if it doesn’t exist).

          • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            I get this is a joke, but speed limits shouldn’t be set by politicians (which I’m hearing apparently is/was a thing?). Politicians have a role to play in getting regulations standards re-written by people who understand the decades of research on this.

            Speeding is mostly a design issue, but I still expect people actually follow the rules.

            Strong Towns, NotJustBikes, City Beautiful, Practical Engineering, among others have made great videos on this topic.

            A lot of people justify speeding, and it’s kinda dumb, if you ask me.

            Just because you “feel” it’s safe, doesn’t mean it actually is.

            Plus, there’s a fantastic way to reduce road deaths, just have fewer cars, switch to public transport, but that takes a long time to implement if the political will doesn’t exist.

    • sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      I live out in the sticks, and if I don’t go 70, it will take me forever to get where I need to go. Also everyone else is going 70, so the people doing 50 are creating an unsafe situation. It’s the wild west out here.

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    This comment section is a very good case study in why better public transportation is absolutely necessary: a lot of you should not ever drive.

  • callouscomic@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    6 days ago
    1. Escalates the angry driver situation.
    2. Takes photos while driving.

    Neither driver here is in the right.

    • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 days ago

      If it’s a 2 lane per side road the best way to get them to pass you is to not break check them but just take your foot off the gas until they get frustrated enough to just go around but this contextually sounds like a single lane sitch which you are correct is dangerous.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’m a school bus driver and the course material (and test questions) for the CDL state this explicitly. If someone is tailgating you, you slow down. Tailgaters are gonna tailgate no matter what, and slowing down means the damage will be less if they do happen to hit you. If that makes them mad tough tittie (the course material does not use “tough tittie” but you can tell they wanted to).

        The great irony of people who tailgate school buses is that WE CAN’T EVEN FUCKING SEE YOU BACK THERE. Even in your fantasy world of the person in front of you feeling pressured and speeding up (which never ever actually happens), it can’t possibly happen if they don’t even know you’re there.

        • squaresinger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 days ago

          I’m not doubting you at all, but how dumb does one have to be to tailgate a bus? As if you can force a bus into anything.

          If you tailgate a larger vehicle, all you do is put yourself into mortal danger.

          • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            how dumb does one have to be to tailgate a bus?

            Pretty fucking dumb but it’s a low bar. The only upside to tailgating a larger vehicle like a bus is that our stopping distance is a lot greater so the tailgater is less likely to slam into us.

        • Squirrelanna@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 days ago

          Unfortunately for some, that pressure is real and entirely illogical. For the longest time my wife would start getting anxious and frustrated when someone tailgated her and would start to speed up… Only to contue getting tailgated by the same person. Took a lot of insistence from me to not play their stupid game for her to realize that not only was it stupid to speed up for them, but more dangerous and entirely illegal to start speeding just because of a tailgater.

    • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      I would fully agree that confronting a lunatic face to face is dangerous, but the chances of getting shot for driving slow is next to zero.

  • MetalMachine@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    This is why I’m in favor of public transit. So many people should not be on the road. This goes for the granny under the speed limit drivers and the insane road ragers.

    • LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’ve never understood why people pick on drivers under the speed limit. It’s called a limit, why do we expect people to be over it?

      • CoolMatt@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Depending where it is, a figure of speech up to a certain point of where they actual enforce it, most cops don’t even go the speed limit on some roads and highways.

        They’re low and out dated as fuck, and mostly just a money grab, again, depending on the street and the limit, for example excluding in front of schools and parks

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        because they are assholes who think anyone going slower than them is stupid and they are very smart and the speed limit should not apply to such very smart people.

    • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I say this to every coworker who asks why I have a car I rarely drive. It’s honestly just less stressful to commute that way. Idgaf about the weirdos at the bus stop for the most part. 90% of them are high or drunk af passed out cleanly. Every once in a while I have to nudge them out of the way to sit but that’s not usually an issue they just grunt and shift and they’re usually too shitfaced to move in their sleep once they’re out again. One is a lady who is always drunk af but awake and basically just uses the bus stop as a people watching spot and tells me neighborhood drama. There’s a pair of northerners who are polite in a northerner way. There were a brother and sister who were sleeping there for a month but last I heard she found a job and I wished them luck and haven’t seen them since. I’ve had a few really good philosophical conversations. One was a guy who had gotten his phone stolen and we chatted about the positive effects of increased mindfulness of the day to day and not being constantly observed and reachable by both your personal contacts and the faceless corporations. I got bothered by one guy but groundskeepers were hanging kinda close and the admins pass me on their way from their cars into the building I haven’t seen him since so either the facility took care of it or the other inhabitants did. Sometimes I talk, sometimes I just eat my Bacon and biscuit from the cafeteria and drink some tea. I’m trying to listen my way through the Bible just to know what’s in it. Right now I’m listening to the long long list of shit you’re not allowed to do while living in an aggressive war tribe in tents the desert like shitting too close to camp or having sex that doesn’t make more babies to keep fighting the other tribes. The cadence is weirdly chill almost seussian.

  • 74 183.84@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 days ago

    When people ride my ass while I am doing (at least) the speed limit I just take my foot off the gas to gently slow down until they go around me. If its only one lane then I will go under the speed limit. Im petty too like that

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s not just petty, it’s safety.

      You can’t influence the size of the safety margin between you and the car behind you. But you can influence the speed at which the person behind you slams into you in case of an accident, by reducing the speed that both of you drive.

      • rayyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 days ago

        When I drive in deer country, especially at night, I will always slow up when encountering a tailgater because I might have to brake hard for an animal and don’t want to hit a deer AND/OR get rear ended - going slower means they will at least hit me less hard. They can go around if they don’t like my speed. Also, statistics show that drivers that stay well behind other vehicles have far fewer accidents. Finally, traffic tends to travel at the speed of the slowest drivers on the road, so they gain little on our curvy, hilly two lane roads.

  • Paddzr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Using phone while driving… Great.

    Fuck everyone who ever touches their phone while the vehicle is on. This shit is not okay, ever.

    • Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 days ago
      1. The phone is clearly mounted on the dashboard.

      2. It’s not uncommon for people to record their whole trip for social media, not just take to a picture.

      3. This caption could have been pasted over a completely unrelated screenshot of someone else’s video for all we know.

      Don’t touch your phone while driving, but also, don’t believe everything you see on social media.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Ikr the number of people going “hurr they do phone use” has me wondering when the fuck people lost basic cognitive skills.

      • Paddzr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        5 days ago

        On your last point… It’s still damaging because it normalises it. UK has very harsh stance on this and you’d get in shit even for point 1. There should be zero tolerance on this. They’re a dickhead driver regardless. Two dickheads don’t make it right.

        • PurplebeanZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          Incorrect, in the UK you can touch/use the phone if it’s mounted in a cradle. Touch it un-cradled though and wham that’s instant points even if it was out of battery and turned off

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s not uncommon for people to record their whole trip for social media, not just take to a picture.

        That’s still a distraction. Even if they don’t intend to upload the entire recording they are paying less attention to the road in order to pay attention to their “performance”.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 days ago

      I have some great news for you. Look at what took effect yesterday in my state! Using a mobile device, including at a red light, is now a primary offense (you’ll get pulled over for just that).

      This just applies to PA, but it’s a pretty big state with a population between Sweden and the Netherlands, so it’s not nothing!

      https://www.pa.gov/content/dam/copapwp-pagov/en/penndot/documents/travelinpa/safety/trafficsafetyanddrivertopics/documents/distracted-driving-laws-fact-sheet.pdf

      • coolfission@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Doesn’t matter if it’s not enforced. We have no holding phone rules in GA and I routinely see people using their phones while driving.

        • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          Worse, too often these laws are selectively enforced only when cops are looking for an excuse to profile minorities and poorer drivers.

          • LousyCornMuffins@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            yeah i was gonna say. they enforced the no texting law for maybe a year here, then they just started using “I thought I saw them texting” as probable cause to pull over anyone they wanted.

        • Almacca@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          They put up cameras to detect phone and seatbelt offences here in Queensland a couple of years ago. It’s been quite lucrative for the state.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        I live in PA and I’m not holding my breath for this shit to ever be enforced. I’m a school bus driver and last year I had a local cop pass me when I was stopped with my red flashers on letting kids off the bus. He was driving with one hand and looking at his phone in the other - never even saw me.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      tbf, going 20 in a 50 zone is probably not a terrible situation to be multitasking in. not at all like multitasking at 50 in a 50 zone

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m a school bus driver and many of my coworkers use their phones (talking, texting and even doom scrolling) while driving a bus - sometimes even when they have kids aboard. And these buses have internal cameras that are always recording! I don’t understand how they’re not fired or at least suspended for it, but I suppose the driver shortage has something to do with it.

  • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    What to do when you have a tailgater behind you:

    1. Foot off the gas.
    2. Wait until the tailgater tries to overtake you.
    3. PIT maneuver.
    4. Keep driving safely.
  • herrvogel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    The only reason I accept to not let these people pass is if it forces you do something unsafe, like throwing yourself over to the next lane and slamming on the brakes to match speed with the other cars. Otherwise just give them the lane and let them be a reckless ass somewhere else away from you. Safer that way. It’s not your job to enforce traffic rules.

    • forkDestroyer@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      6 days ago

      Exactly. You have no clue why they’re speeding either. Sure it could be some a-hole, but it could also be someone with a medical situation, or someone that’s about to poop their pants.

      When I was younger I used to stay in the lane. Now I move over if it’s safe, and let them pass. Not worth the chance of accidentally upsetting a psycho.

      • Lemzlez@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        6 days ago

        I agree it’s safer to let them pass, but a medical (or personal) emergency does not give you the right to endanger other people on the road by driving fast and/or recklessly. That’s why they paint priority vehicles in bright colours and put flashing lights on them - to make it safer for everyone.

        If you have a medical emergency, you call an ambulance. Yes, they will have to drive to you first, but care starts when they arrive. If the emergency isn’t big enough to get an ambulance, there’s no reason to drive fast either.

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Love reading threads about driving cause everyone is very upset for no discernible reason.

  • yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Is this lady using her phone while driving, after speeding by 20MPH and thinking it’s a flex? If she uses it at 20MPH I’d bet she uses it at 70 MPH too! Couldn’t this have waited until she was safely off the road?

    • TeddE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I expect this is sarcasm (can’t know, because of Poe’s)

      But for anyone genuinely thinking this you can see the dashcam source in her glasses reflection.

  • Landless2029@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I was on a 3 lane highway going interstate. Doing 80 in a 65 on the fast lane. Big rig in the middle lane. Slowly gaining and will pass the bog rig.

    Then a pickup is coming up in the fast lane TOO FAST. Easily 100mph. She tailgates me. Now boxxed in with me in front and the big rig on her right. A sane person would go in the third lane and pass us since zero other cars around. But no.

    She lays on her horn and starts swaying with impatience.
    So I match speed with the big rig. Maintaining the box. She honks ways more and sways even more. Shaking her fist at me.

    I maintain it for another 2 minutes until my wife gets concerned she’ll rear end us and we end up spinning off the highway or under the big rig.

    I give in and speed up past the big rig and change lanes to her wacko pass. They speed off.

    Yeah it’s never worth it. You never know what people will do.

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah, better to just get them the fuck away from you ASAP than to be petty. They’re not worth the risk since they’ve already established they’re shitty drivers.

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Very true. Many people act irrationally behind the wheel. Only God knows how pathetic their life must be that they want to risk life and limb to get somewhere 3 minutes faster.

      • Landless2029@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        It wasn’t even about going faster at that point.

        I was trying to force them to slow down and go around… Instead they went apeshit.

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Truly. I’ve been on the motorway before with a dude seemingly angry about something I did, not sure what, that he was chasing me across the motorway even if I went from lane 4 to 1 and back he was there.

      Some people are insane. Best to avoid them even if you can handle yourself as some people won’t let it go and not worth the fight if you’re not immediately in danger.