• ElectricTrombone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    156
    ·
    16 days ago

    This reminds me of the time the police got called to an office building because someone saw a man with a rifle in one of the windows. Turns out it was a gaming studio, and the man was a human-size cardboard cutout advertising Battlefield or some similar first person shooter.

    • toynbee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 days ago

      At the hospital where I had my sleep studies done the only available parking was next to a probably five story building. On the second floor down from the top someone had put a mannequin in an EMS vest against their office window and left the lights on.

      Whoever that person was should feel accomplished, as it successfully startled me every time I had to walk across that parking lot alone at 10pm.

  • Zagam@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    16 days ago

    Was it Terry Pratchett or Douglas Addams that had a witch that was going to be burned at the stake? She had a little future-sight abd went to her death willingly and with dignity. And with 50pounds of roofing nails in a barrel of gunpowder under her dress.

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      16 days ago

      Any sort of trap is illegal, for good reason.

      Although tannerite is stable unless you shoot it with a round going over 2000ft/s

      • _stranger_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        What if you hung a sign in your house stating “This is my tannerite storage mannequin, do not shoot him”?

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          I’m pretty sure it would still be illegal. The logic behind traps being illegal is that they harm indiscriminately. And in the case of explosives they have the potential to harm more than just the person who triggered the trap.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Would this count as a trap? You could probably argue needing someone to fire a supersonic round into it makes it not a trap.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 days ago

      So is executing unarmed people in the street but that seems to be where the calvinball game is at.

        • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          This is for when they come to your house. At that point your best case scenario is that you’re dragged perfectly healthy to a concentration camp.

          • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            Right. But the chance that your booby trap is discovered by the law without it blowing up is way higher than it serving it’s purpose as an uno reverse against ICE.

            So rather than going to prison for no reason, I say take the fight to them!

    • redsand@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      Probably in most jurisdictions but maybe not if you shoot it yourself. Then it goes from being a trap to a remote controlled weapon.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Extremely, there are explicit laws against booby trapping your own property and you can face full prosecution even if it harms only burglars.

      • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 days ago

        If Boris is being shot and explodes, the likelihood of the home owner already being killed by ICE or other agents is pretty high.

          • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 days ago

            Doesn’t even need that. If Boris is in the foyer, I’m answering the front door. If push comes to shove and I’m killed at the front door, they already know a threat exists. Then they enter the house and attempt to detain Boris.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        Gotta ask though, if it needs to be shot to go off, is that really a booby trap? I have draino in my house, that isn’t a trap. Maybe you have to put a sign on it saying don’t shoot?

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 days ago

          It would absolutely, 100% go to trial, and the prosecution could easily prove an intent to harm.

          As much as the Better Call Saul kinds of legal arguments look clever on TV, in reality the law is much more about vibes and how people interpret what happened.

          • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            There’s a lot of reasonableness and average person would expect in law, but needing a supersonic bullet to hit it is well out of reasonable territory.

          • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 days ago

            I just wonder where the line is. Is it intent to harm. So if say the thing was a gift, and they didn’t know it was explosive. Would that absolve the person of guilt. Maybe it goes to manslaughter in that case?

            • ameancow@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 days ago

              There are a lot of serious laws in the US about owning, transporting and storing explosives (thank you Anarchist bomber movement last century) as well as requirements for permits and the like, so you would have to prove it was a “gift” and not intended to be used for anything, but even then you would not only face negligence charges/manslaughter if someone was killed, but also various kinds of “aggravated” charges related to public safety. I am not a lawyer but I have a feeling the prosecution would make a pretty heavy case to make an example.

  • Tab981@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    16 days ago

    I’m worried Boris won’t go off. He’s most likely to be shot with a handgun which won’t set off the tannerite.

    • YellowParenti@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 days ago

      You can also put the explosif in a steel trapezoid with the wide part open towards the front. Basically a claymore, but you’d have to manually set it off.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      There’s a mix that’s designed to work with rim fire and other lower-velocity stuff. It’s not as powe4ful, but is more-easily triggered.

      A dumb friend put some in a chewing tobacco tin and launch it from a skeet launcher to shoot with a shotgun using bird shot. I personally would not be that close to anything I was blowing up, even with a plastic shell.

      • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 days ago

        A plastic shell could be even worse, too. Using plastic and glass for shrapnel (I think ceramic as well?) is considered a war crime because they don’t show up on x-rays, which makes it very hard to find - practically impossible in the case of small glass shards.

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    Same energy as “claymore in the snow room aimed at the outside door”. It can only do one thing and it will statistically do it to the person spending the most time around it, not any imagined opposition.

    • halfsalesman@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      16 days ago

      If I am not mistaken, you have to shoot tannerite to cause it to go off. So unless the owner in this case is shooting guns in their house it seems pretty likely this wont go off or harm them, but will harm someone who chooses to shoot an armed civilian for not putting their gun down.

      • bizarroland@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        That’s the joke.jpg

        ICE is shooting unarmed civilians, so seeing Boris here would make their nuts shrivel like a booger on an Arizona Tarmac in the middle of summer, and the only way for them to regain their illusion of masculinity will be to shoot him, too.

      • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 days ago

        While tannerite does need that extreme concussion to go off, it is still more likely to hurt the person who set it up as this seems like a stand off tactic.

        Unless you have to enter the house to see Boris. They are gonna shoot from a distance.

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          Tannerite is designed to be shot from a distance. It’s main purpose is to give immediate feedback when you hit a long distance target.

          That’s what the screws are for.

  • JojoWakaki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    15 days ago

    175 lbs of Tannerite. Boris, the house and some part of the neighborhood will attempt a space voyage, if Boris gets shot.

  • eatCasserole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    16 days ago

    I would be concerned about Boris wrecking a perfectly good foyer. Maybe put at the end of your street, leaning on a tree, just make sure the neighbors know what he is, but not who put him there.