• epicstove@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    13 小时前

    I was in Switzerland and the trains there are incredible. Even the tiniest village in buttfucksburg, nowhere has a train connecting it to the rest of the country.

  • happydoors@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    17 小时前

    To be honest, I haven’t seen anyone else mention the real reason: America allowed private companies to buy and own the lands under the rails in the 1800s in order to deal with the massive distances across the US to connect the West and East. 150 years later and just a few companies own almost all the track and rail across America. Almost all private, not public land. Public citizens and communities have very little control over the railways going through their communities. These companies lobby against and make it difficult to introduce new, public rail lines for a multitude of reasons. This is one of very many examples of how corporations abuse law, monopolistic practices, and media to lessen the power of American citizens.

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 小时前

      That doesn’t even take into account that a lot of rails in the US are owned by Canadian companies.

  • Hazel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    14 小时前

    Trains not planes is a much more reasonable and practical way to get people behind building more railways than planes not cars. We can talk planes not cars once some of the initial infrastructure is in place, but I think focusing on replacing something people hate (flying) rather than replacing something they like (driving) is probably a good place to start.

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 小时前

      Yeah, I’d much rather take a train than plane. However, where I live, I seriously need my car and I enjoy the freedom of driving. I am not in a huge city with rush hour traffic though.

  • daellat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    15 小时前

    I recently went on a holiday using high speed rail in Europe (1100km). Flying was cheaper and faster. Sadly I have feeling of empathy and principles so I went with the train anyway. Wasn’t too bad though just did a lot of reading.

  • InfiniteHench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 天前

    I’m a huge train and transit advocate and I try to take Amtrak every chance I get. But “tickets are cheaper” does not feel like a blanket statement we can make. Maybe on very specific, usually short legs, like Chicago to Milwaukee. Someone correct me if I’m wrong or there’s more nuance but once a trip goes past 3 or 5+ hour mark, the price seems to skyrocket past airfare.

    • AlreadyDefederated@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 小时前

      Oh, that is definitely true in the U.S.

      Also, I’ve found that rail travel is inconvenient in the U.S. I can’t confirm, but it seems like the Amtrak only comes through my (Midwest) area once a week, on Wednesdays or something like that. So, if I plan a trip, I need to plan around.

      Midwest to the East Coast is so much cheaper and faster by air. I want to travel by rail - and you’d think it should be cheaper - but it’s totally not.

      Part of it, I believe, is that Amtrak leases the usage of the rail lines from the shipping companies, so it must adhere to their schedules of shipping freight. The USA spends so much on upgrading its highway system; if they used a fraction of that money towards rail travel we would be set. But certain companies keep lobbying Congress to keep us locked in a model where we are totally reliant on cars and gasoline.

      • cmhe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 小时前

        Also true in many cases in Europe.

        You can get a flight ticket for under 20€ between Germany and UK (RyanAir), and have to pay tenfold that for a train ticket.

        Or a 30€ ticket to Romania per plane. Booking a train to Romania is much more difficult and expensive and also easily over 100€.

        I would wish that train tickets are cheaper than plane tickets, but if you cross country borders, booking train tickets becomes expensive and difficult in Europe.

        • spookex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 小时前

          Not even going international on a train can be more expensive.

          It cost me almost the same price to take the ICE (not that one yanks) from one part of Germany to another, to visit my mom than it was for me to fly from Germany to Latvia on Ryanair

    • bier@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 小时前

      In Europe when you book ahead of time and are not too specific about the dates you can fly much cheaper. If I want to go from Amsterdam to Barcelona I can get a much much cheaper flight. Why would I go for the option that is slower and more expensive?

      I wish trains where cheaper I’d take them more often.

      I once heard someone make the argument flying is cheaper because a plane can fly from one airport to almost any other airport. So when you own a plane you can use it in a much more flexible way. A train can only go over a fixed track, yes you can use switches etc. But when you build an airport basically any plane can go there immediately. For trains it doesn’t work like that. Make matters even worse in Europe usually train operators are national and most trains don’t cross borders beyond a few stations.

  • Omega@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 天前

    Rail is hard if it’s from one country to another (I think Europe is the exception)

    In my case, I have to take rail from Ankara to Edirne, Edirne to Bucharest, Bucharest to Vienna, and after Vienna I can access anywhere in Europe

    The problem is, going from Edirne to Bucharest requires two visas

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      15 小时前

      Even in the EU there are still some difficulties. Like Finland and Estonia are on broad gauge not standard gauge. So their network isn’t connected to the rest of the EU. Spain and French haven’t connected their high speed rail network because of some dispute. So you have to get off at the border take a slow train across the border than walk to another platform to get on the other train.

      Also rules says the crew needs to speak the local language of the country the train drives trough and traffic rules vary by country so if the driver doesn’t speak the language or doesn’t know the rules they need to change drivers when a train crosses a border which adds more delays.

      Problem is also that there are still many rail networks in Europe that are privately owned.

  • TheSlad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 天前

    Americans can’t do trains because it requires public infrastructure (rails), which apparently we are allergic to.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 天前

    The cost of dedicated passenger rail lines is staggering, and the US has a LOT of ground to cover.

    • Fleur_@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 天前

      Yeah no country has ever built a high speed passenger rail network interconnecting cities spread throughout an area comparable to the usa. And it’s absurd to think that it could be done in under 20 years and receive massive popular support and have universally recognised benefits. Guys the cost is too high for the biggest economy on earth and the distance is so far that they could never build a railway across it especially not more than 100 years ago.

      (Well to be fair the Chinese did also build the railways across the US so maybe they do have something America doesn’t)

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 小时前

      As someone from Russia, we have even larger territory, and going by rail is almost twice as cheap as by plane.

      High speed rail from Saint Petersburg to Moscow will cost you ~$45, going by plane will set you back ~$75 on the cheapest flight with hand luggage only. Considering the time losses associated with airports, you’ll be at your destination almost as fast for way cheaper, so this option is widely preferred.

      Same story with long distance trips - I plan on going for a 1000km trip in July, and train ticket costed me the same $45, while cheapest plane tickets go around $100. It’s also a night train with beds and all, so I have one night accommodation for free while on my way. Depart - have a nice sleep - be on your destination in the morning and have a full day to yourself, fully rested.

      If you’re feeling adventurous, you can go all the way from Moscow to Vladivostok by single train for $250. This will take almost a week, but it will get you around half the planet for that money.

    • doylio@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 小时前

      Something like 30% of the US lives in the strip between Washington DC and Boston. It’s absolutely achievable for the richest country on Earth to provide high speed rail in that section.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 小时前

        There’s already a lot of passenger rail options in that part of the country. I’ve used it, and it works great.

        This post is specifically about using it in place of airlines, which is used for longer-distance travel.

        • doylio@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 小时前

          If you want to use it in place of airlines, you need high-speed rail. Something that the US has basically none of

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 小时前

            Which goes back to the issue of the difficulty of building high-speed rail across long distances.

            Higj-speed rail can’t be built at grade like freight rail. You can’t risk a cow getting through a fence or a crossing signal failure leading to a high-speed train collision.

    • Chakravanti@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 天前

      Well, technically, you’re not because no one is. America is dead. Some corporate fraudster (redundant to say that, I know), tricked zuckers into fucking anything at all didn’t matter, broke the machines with the cracker, generated his fraud of success (like every corporation, ever), then threw away half the votes so that those idiots discoverrs could fight with those calling out the cracker instead of realizing that they agree that:

      That “person” is NOT the president. Never was, but that’s a whole other corporate sham. When no one stopped them, they’re dismanted the whole gorram gov and Auctioned it out after smuggling anything that mattered to the other place doing the same damn shit pretending we’re any fucking different from his trick.

  • Soapbox@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 天前

    Americans can’t do high speed rail because we have aircraft, automobile, and petroleum industries who don’t want us to.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    2 天前

    Yeah why doesn’t Europe have trains?

    Europe definitely doesn’t have trains already.

    • whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      2 天前

      Still too much plane for local journeys

      And is France train are not cheaper than planes or buses… Which is stupid, they should start to properly taxe Airlines

      • Tenkard@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 天前

        They’re building high speed rails connecting major European cities as we speak, we’ll be good

      • Opisek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 天前

        Do you happen to use Dvorak?

        Sorry for the random question out of this air, but the in/is typo is something that happens a lot to me while being nearly impossible on “standard” keyboard layouts.

    • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 天前

      We do. Not as much as we used to because privatisation is a plague upon mankind, also we have very diverse geography which makes developing new lines prohibitively expensive, even more so when you’re a private company. Add to that a lack of political backing and yeah, it’s all rather turgid, even if there are some extremely recent talks concerning transeuropean night trains and such.

      Those are going to be for our nice flat and speedy routes no doubt, but hey, it’s an effort in the right direction.

      But yeah, things are not gonna get better fast as long as we are cursed with privatisation. What a shit show to see our glorious TGV reduced to a shell of its former self.

      Meanwhile I just got an article yesterday that Wuhan is now connected to the super high speed network and the first 450kph train now connects it to Shanghai. Last time I was there the train was already TGV levels of speed and much more modern, and only a year later they are leaving us on the fucking dust…

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 天前

        China sees investment in mass transit as a loss leader. It costs more to put in than it generates in fairs, but the boost to connected economic zones pays back the cost several times over.

        The US sees investment in mass transit as a detriment to the airline, automotive, and fossil fuel industries. It would shrink the economy in three places where the nation has tried to goose growth for the last 60 years.

        • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 天前

          For real. If those idiot neighbours would stop fucking around, we get trains from Wuhan to Bordeaux in about a week. It’s a real game changer.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 天前

            What if we told them they could keep killing each other, just on the train, and then we’d make a murder mystery about it?

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 天前

          I never really understand why historically trains were so rare in the US. They had loads of trains at one point left over from the industrial Revolution and then they seemed to decide to get rid of them all. Even Beaching didn’t shut down that many lines

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 天前

        If you’re on a long tube that travels quickly on the ground from one city to another, and everyone is talking in Spanish, you’re in a train.

        If you’re in a long tube that travels quickly on the air from one city to another, and everyone is talking English, you’re on a plane

    • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 天前

      My total journey from Berlin home this week was about 50 minutes late, and the connection after the ICE was not pretty.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 天前

        Apparently Germany’s problem is that they run all the high-speed trains on the normal lines which means all of the normal trains have to work around them. Obviously you can’t have a normal train in front of a high-speed train so if the high-speed train is delayed by even a small amount it has a knock-on effect where a bunch of local service trains have to sit around waiting for the line to clear.

        Everyone else runs high-speed rail on their own tracks. So everyone gets to do what they want and not affect anybody else.

        The French do it better than the Germans, which is just not an acceptable state of affairs.

      • arrow74@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 天前

        50 minutes isn’t that bad tbh. I dont remember the last time I flew that there wasn’t a delay. Hell even the whole arriving 2 hours before ,finding parking, going through security is all so much more of a hassle.

        I’d much rather walk 5 minutes to the local subway head to the hauptbahnhof and wait 50 extra minutes for my train. I can at least go get a reasonably priced coffee while I wait.

        • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 小时前

          It was bad enough. Schlimmer geht immer.

          Also, comparing flights and trains doesn’t really work, I think. The getting into the plane time alone makes it too different.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 天前

    Honestly I think it’s just sticker shock. I would say that as soon as we get some people would be more willing to get more, but no, because people are hesitant to expand existing rail. MARTA please expand, I beg you. Oh great spirits of public transit, I pray that you soften the NIMBYs’ hearts.

    It’s so upsetting that every small town in my state has an old historic train stop but none of them are actually passenger train stops anymore. Once you see it you can’t unsee it. I am 15 minutes from my town’s historic train stop which is a steak house now. My parents are about the same distance from theirs, probably even closer, but it’s a museum or something. Can I just take a walk to the train, ride down, and see them? Nope. Gotta deal with the hellscape that is metro Atlanta traffic.