• mad_asshatter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Sadly, half of voting Americans think you’re a fascist, Chinese bot.
      Or a woke commie queer groomer in drag.

            • Thorry84@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              But even when someone doesn’t vote, that doesn’t mean they aren’t Maga?

              So if half of voters are Maga and 1/3 of eligible voters actually vote, it’s almost impossible to say something about the population as a whole. We can say about 16% would be the lower limit, but it could be a lot higher. If we take the voters as an unbiased large sample, we could extrapolate and say 50% of the population is actually Maga. But since voters are by definition a biased sample, it’s hard to say what the actual number would be. Especially with humans, that have complex interactions, like a certain persuasion could actually mean someone is less likely to vote. Or the other way around, where wanting to vote makes one persuasion more likely. This makes the whole thing pretty hard.

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Why not both?

        I mean, I can be a woke queer, fascist, Chinese groomer in drag that’s a bot, can’t I? It’s a free country ;)

        • mad_asshatter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          “Equal in the eyes of the Creator” allows us to be us, without adversely affecting our equals.
          The hypocrites don’t believe in mirrors.

        • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          You could, but I’d imagine your therapist sending you a fruit cake every year at christmas as a thank you for latest new lambo you funded

          • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Well, are you okay? You’re kinda not making much sense in your comments here. Like, the individual sentences make sense, sorta (this one anyway), but they don’t match what you’re responding to very well.

            It makes it seem like you’re responding to the wrong comments. Is that the case? Gods know I fuck that up myself.

    • robocall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Trump isn’t a proper representation of a New Yorker. I doubt he even likes baseball.

      • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        I still don’t understand how a bunch of Southern, trailer park rednecks who hate new York city rich people, decided that a Manhattan millionaire was the guy to vote for. Why do they think he’s anything like them or has why idea how they live? He’s literally a northern, cartoonish carpet bagger.

        • garbagebagel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m sure there’s deeper takes on this but from my understanding, it’s a mix of things: 1) he convinced them he’s not like other politicians (which is true, he was not a politician at all) and 2) he convinced them he’s the “pull yourself up by the jockstrap” American dream and everyone can be like him - that’s just the typical American lie they’ve been using for decades if not longer. Then sprinkle a little bit of christofacist fear mongering in there and you got some undereducated folks excited to see someone who’ll “fight” for their American dream.

  • pelletbucket@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    for some reason Donald Trump doesn’t go in the category of “people named Donald” in my head. like Tom Cruise, he’s not a Tom, or a Thomas, he’s always Tom Cruise.

    when I hear somebody else’s first name is donald, it doesn’t make me think of him

    • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      This website is temporarily unavailable. So I can’t check their source. How do they claim to be representative across the whole of whatever region they’re polling?

      • AmidFuror@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        It’s not from polling. It’s from the Social Security Administration. I gave a better link in a different fork of this comment thread.

        Edit: It’s for USA and anyone who applied for an SSN. So everyone but some off-the-grid nutters.

        Data Source

        All names are from Social Security card applications for births that occurred in the United States after 1879. Note that many people born before 1937 never applied for a Social Security card, so their names are not included in our data. For others who did apply, our records may not show the place of birth, and again their names are not included in our data. All data are from a 100% sample of our records on Social Security card applications as of March 2024.

  • FireTower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t think people 20+ years from now will instantly jump to Trump when they hear Donald. Just like how if you meet George you don’t think of Bush.

    • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Which I never understood. Khaleesi was her title, not her name.
      It´s equivalent-ish to naming a kid King or Czar or something.

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        It’s even worse, because my understanding is that “Khaleesi” doesn’t actually mean “queen”, but would more accurately mean “concubine/wife of the king/khal”. I believe the queenship is only implied after the death of the khal.

        • Ech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          Not really implied by the term itself, since after the death of the khal the khaleesi are basically exiled to the capital. Daenerys only brought greater meaning to the title when she used it in her conquests.

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      My niece named her daughter after Bella from Twilight. At least her full name is Isabella, but the inspiration is there.

      • db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        Tell her to tell people she’s named after the Phineas and Ferb character. There’s zero down side.

    • MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      A lot of us jumped on the fad of naming our daughters after Game of Thrones characters, especially the ones popular in the earlier seasons. And then D and D came along as show runners, and fucking wrecked everything for our baby girls. So Hodor, I regret getting sucked into that show and hope you’ll forgive me one day.

      • greenshirtdenimjeans@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I like the name actually and don’t think it’s bad at all. The shower thought OP posted just reminded me of it. This dothraki female liberator saving her people —-> dragon firing everyone lol

        I don’t think Khaleesi or Donald are going to be names that are dunked on in the future, at least not that badly.

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Reminds me of that other name that kind of just withered away. What was it?

    Oh yeah…

    Adolf.

  • cashmaggot@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    Afaraf
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Last few years, but named Donald? They were horny for Trump. Last few decades? Still could be horny for Trump @_@!